Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Mildred Albert"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Yoninah (new) |
imported>Drchriswilliams (nomination reviewed, good to go.) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] eligibility for DYK is from this article having been created on 22 December and nominated the same day. The prose section of this biography is long enough and organised in sections. The text of the article is neutral and policy-compliant. A variety of sources are used across the article, the majority of which are available online without a subscription being required. I did not detect any copyright issues and any paraphrasing is not too close to cause problems. The hook is short enough, interesting enough, policy-compliant and is sourced. There is no image included in the nomination. QPQ has been declared. Good to Go. [[User:Drchriswilliams|Drchriswilliams]] ([[User talk:Drchriswilliams|talk]]) 15:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 15:44, 25 December 2016
DYK toolbox |
---|
Mildred Albert
- ... that Mildred Albert, nicknamed the "Mighty Atom", produced thousands of fashion shows during her career? Source: "Albert married international lawyer James Albert in 1928 ... He named her 'Mighty Atom' after her initials, and says she has changed little in 60 years" (UPI); "The above chronology lists only a few of the thousands of fashion shows Albert produced" (Harvard University Library)
- Reviewed: Léolo
- Comment: Created for Women in Red – Jewish women
Created by Yoninah (talk). Self-nominated at 22:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC).
eligibility for DYK is from this article having been created on 22 December and nominated the same day. The prose section of this biography is long enough and organised in sections. The text of the article is neutral and policy-compliant. A variety of sources are used across the article, the majority of which are available online without a subscription being required. I did not detect any copyright issues and any paraphrasing is not too close to cause problems. The hook is short enough, interesting enough, policy-compliant and is sourced. There is no image included in the nomination. QPQ has been declared. Good to Go. Drchriswilliams (talk) 15:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)