Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Minecraft mods"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset (reviewer forgot his or her sig; adding it) |
imported>Jolly Janner (promoted to Template:Did you know/Preparation area 1) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from February 2016]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by '''<font color="#00824A">[[User:Jolly Janner|Jolly]]</font> <font color="#2A5FFF">[[Special:Contributions/Jolly Janner|Ω]]</font> <font color="#00824A">[[User talk:Jolly Janner|Janner]]</font>''' 08:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Minecraft mods==== | ====Minecraft mods==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Minecraft mods|Minecraft mods}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Minecraft mods|Minecraft mods}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that '''[[Minecraft mods|mods]]''' are credited as one of the main reasons behind ''[[Minecraft|Minecraft's]]'' success? | * ... that '''[[Minecraft mods|mods]]''' are credited as one of the main reasons behind ''[[Minecraft|Minecraft's]]'' success? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Cut Sleeve|Cut Sleeve]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Cut Sleeve|Cut Sleeve]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Amberrock|Amberrock]] ([[User talk:Amberrock|talk]]). Self-nominated at 17:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Amberrock|Amberrock]] ([[User talk:Amberrock|talk]]). Self-nominated at 17:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | :*The article is new, being created six days ago, and is clearly long enough. There's nothing particularly wrong about the article and everything seems to be within policy. The hook is interesting, though it may make one think the target article is [[mod (video gaming)]] rather than [[Minecraft mods]]. I suppose it doesn't matter, though, as the hook is accurate according to the source (''[[Wired.com|Wired]]'', a reliable source) and reasonably neutral. QPQ checks out fine enough; I think the argument you added is valid. All in all, it all checks out: [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Maplestrip|Maplestrip]] ([[User talk:Maplestrip|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Maplestrip|contribs]]) 18:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC)</span></small></div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | |
Revision as of 08:11, 25 February 2016
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Jolly Ω Janner 08:10, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Minecraft mods
- ... that mods are credited as one of the main reasons behind Minecraft's success?
- Reviewed: Cut Sleeve
Created by Amberrock (talk). Self-nominated at 17:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC).
- The article is new, being created six days ago, and is clearly long enough. There's nothing particularly wrong about the article and everything seems to be within policy. The hook is interesting, though it may make one think the target article is mod (video gaming) rather than Minecraft mods. I suppose it doesn't matter, though, as the hook is accurate according to the source (Wired, a reliable source) and reasonably neutral. QPQ checks out fine enough; I think the argument you added is valid. All in all, it all checks out: 16px — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maplestrip (talk • contribs) 18:58, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
