Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Missa Princeps Pacis"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Gerda Arendt
(reviewed)
imported>Northamerica1000
(Per the completed QPQ review, I announce that this nomination is now good to go.)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
::: I reviewed now. Thanks for the extra source. Reliable or not, the review supports that the event happened as announced, - which is not always so. - Will perform the piece at [[Propsteikirche, Leipzig|an exciting location]], - hope that will happen as [http://propsteimusik-leipzig.de/ announced]. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 
::: I reviewed now. Thanks for the extra source. Reliable or not, the review supports that the event happened as announced, - which is not always so. - Will perform the piece at [[Propsteikirche, Leipzig|an exciting location]], - hope that will happen as [http://propsteimusik-leipzig.de/ announced]. --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 09:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 
+
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Per the completed QPQ review, I announce that this nomination is now good to go. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 10:08, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 10:08, 30 May 2017

Missa Princeps Pacis

5x expanded by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 21:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg New enough and expanded 5x, all ¶ have inline citations, a copyvio check reveals no problems, hook content is interesting and is verified with an inline citation to a reliable source at the end of the sentence in the article. Prior to performing this review, I added this (new) source at the end of the sentence to expound the sole primary source that was previously in place at the end of the sentence. The primary source is published by St Martin-in-the-Fields, and I do consider it to be reliable despite being primary. I also added the source from Classical Source at the end of the sentence, although I am unsure about the source's reliability. A QPQ remains necessary for this to move forward. North America1000 05:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
I reviewed now. Thanks for the extra source. Reliable or not, the review supports that the event happened as announced, - which is not always so. - Will perform the piece at an exciting location, - hope that will happen as announced. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:54, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Per the completed QPQ review, I announce that this nomination is now good to go. North America1000 10:08, 30 May 2017 (UTC)