Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Montefiore Hospital, Hove"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hassocks5489
(Oops.)
imported>PhnomPencil
(yes)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:*<!--Make first comment here-->
+
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] My OpenOffice says the hook contains 193 characters; it's up to the admin to decide whether to use the alt hook. As for the article, a couple facts in the hook come from local history books to which I have no access (including no preview on Google Books). Since it's not a contentious issue, and I'm not the type to [[WP:PRESUMEINSANITY]] (I've reviewed another of Hassocks' DYKs on a similar topic and it was fine), I have no problems with this. The date checks out and the character count is well over the minimum. Hassocks excels at writing prose and I don't see any copyvio/close phrasing issues for the sources I could check. Nice photo preview, more description on its summary page. Good to go! <span style="text-shadow:#977 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:PhnomPencil|<b style="color:#136">PhnomPencil</b>]] ([[User talk:PhnomPencil|<b style="color:#99f">✉</b>]])</span> 22:56, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
  
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 22:56, 26 December 2012

Montefiore Hospital, Hove

Montefiore Hospital in December 2012

  • ... that a "magnificent" furniture depository in Hove, England, designed by local architects Clayton & Black, later became an insurance office and—from November—the Montefiore Hospital (pictured)?

Created/expanded by Hassocks5489 (talk). Self nom at 22:46, 19 December 2012 (UTC) (New pic added and description tweaked now.) Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 13:54, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg My OpenOffice says the hook contains 193 characters; it's up to the admin to decide whether to use the alt hook. As for the article, a couple facts in the hook come from local history books to which I have no access (including no preview on Google Books). Since it's not a contentious issue, and I'm not the type to WP:PRESUMEINSANITY (I've reviewed another of Hassocks' DYKs on a similar topic and it was fine), I have no problems with this. The date checks out and the character count is well over the minimum. Hassocks excels at writing prose and I don't see any copyvio/close phrasing issues for the sources I could check. Nice photo preview, more description on its summary page. Good to go! PhnomPencil () 22:56, 26 December 2012 (UTC)