Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Murata Jukō"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Epicgenius |
imported>Epicgenius |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
::::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] {{ping|Epicgenius}} Per [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Supplementary guidelines#Rules for evaluating other people's hooks and articles|Rule H2]], you cannot approve your own hook. This review is also incomplete. Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide| DYK Reviewing guide]]. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 19:16, 30 October 2014 (UTC) | ::::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] {{ping|Epicgenius}} Per [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Supplementary guidelines#Rules for evaluating other people's hooks and articles|Rule H2]], you cannot approve your own hook. This review is also incomplete. Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide| DYK Reviewing guide]]. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 19:16, 30 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::::*{{U|Yoninah}}, I am not approving my own hook, so there may be confusion about that. I have edited my comment, to indicate the original hook is the one that I approve. [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 19:20, 30 October 2014 (UTC) | :::::*{{U|Yoninah}}, I am not approving my own hook, so there may be confusion about that. I have edited my comment, to indicate the original hook is the one that I approve. [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 19:20, 30 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | :*''To finish off the review:'' | + | :*'''To finish off the review:''' |
:**The '''5x expansion''' has been verified. | :**The '''5x expansion''' has been verified. | ||
:**I cannot see any foreign-language sources that are denoted as such. | :**I cannot see any foreign-language sources that are denoted as such. | ||
:**I used a plagiarism checker, and the text does not appear to have been copied without attribution (i.e. it is original text). | :**I used a plagiarism checker, and the text does not appear to have been copied without attribution (i.e. it is original text). | ||
:**The article has a neutral POV. | :**The article has a neutral POV. | ||
| − | :* ''Now'' | + | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] ''Now'' the original hook is good to go. I am not very familiar with doing DYK reviews, so I apologize for any snags. – [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 19:26, 30 October 2014 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 19:28, 30 October 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Murata Jukō
- ... that Murata Jukō created the Japanese tea ceremony?
- Reviewed: Herdla Airport
5x expanded by Yunshui (talk), Tksb (talk). Nominated by Yunshui (talk) at 12:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC).
-
- ALT1: ... that Murata Jukō created chanoyu, the Japanese tea ceremony?
- This alt would be less confusing, as the article references chanoyu, but Japanese tea ceremony is linked, i.e. Template:Tq. – Epicgenius (talk) 20:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
- As an alternative, the article itself can be changed to link directly to Japanese tea ceremony, and we can keep the existing hook: i.e. Template:Tq.
- Template:Reply to Do you have any comments? – Epicgenius (talk) 15:02, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- I see your point. I'm in favour of changing the article, myself, so I'll go and do that now. Yunshui 雲水 15:09, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
The original hook looks good to go. Epicgenius (talk) 18:25, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Template:Ping Per Rule H2, you cannot approve your own hook. This review is also incomplete. Details that are supposed to be checked in a review can be found at DYK Reviewing guide. Yoninah (talk) 19:16, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- Template:U, I am not approving my own hook, so there may be confusion about that. I have edited my comment, to indicate the original hook is the one that I approve. Epicgenius (talk) 19:20, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
- To finish off the review:
- The 5x expansion has been verified.
- I cannot see any foreign-language sources that are denoted as such.
- I used a plagiarism checker, and the text does not appear to have been copied without attribution (i.e. it is original text).
- The article has a neutral POV.
Now the original hook is good to go. I am not very familiar with doing DYK reviews, so I apologize for any snags. – Epicgenius (talk) 19:26, 30 October 2014 (UTC)