Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Murata Jukō"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Epicgenius
(argh)
imported>Yoninah
(Thank you! I'm striking through ALT1)
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Looks good; the whole article is referenced, esp. that statement.<p>However, we can also say that:
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Looks good; the whole article is referenced, esp. that statement.<p>However, we can also say that:
::*'''ALT1:''' ... that '''[[Murata Jukō]]''' created ''chanoyu'', the [[Japanese tea ceremony]]?  
+
::*'''ALT1:''' <s>... that '''[[Murata Jukō]]''' created ''chanoyu'', the [[Japanese tea ceremony]]? </s>
 
:*This alt would be less confusing, as the article references ''chanoyu'', but Japanese tea ceremony is linked, i.e. {{tq|<nowiki>[[Japanese tea ceremony|chanoyu]]</nowiki>}}. – [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 20:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 
:*This alt would be less confusing, as the article references ''chanoyu'', but Japanese tea ceremony is linked, i.e. {{tq|<nowiki>[[Japanese tea ceremony|chanoyu]]</nowiki>}}. – [[User:Epicgenius|Epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 20:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 
:* As an alternative, the article itself can be changed to link directly to [[Japanese tea ceremony]], and we can keep the existing hook: i.e. {{tq|<nowiki>as the founder of chanoyu, the [[Japanese tea ceremony]]</nowiki>}}.
 
:* As an alternative, the article itself can be changed to link directly to [[Japanese tea ceremony]], and we can keep the existing hook: i.e. {{tq|<nowiki>as the founder of chanoyu, the [[Japanese tea ceremony]]</nowiki>}}.

Revision as of 19:37, 30 October 2014

Murata Jukō

5x expanded by Yunshui (talk), Tksb (talk). Nominated by Yunshui (talk) at 12:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Looks good; the whole article is referenced, esp. that statement.

    However, we can also say that:

  • I see your point. I'm in favour of changing the article, myself, so I'll go and do that now. Yunshui  15:09, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg The original hook looks good to go. Epicgenius (talk) 18:25, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Template:U, I am not approving my own hook, so there may be confusion about that. I have edited my comment, to indicate the original hook is the one that I approve. I would like to complete the review: Epicgenius (talk) 19:20, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
  • To finish off the review:
    • The 5x expansion has been verified. Its prose is long enough.
    • I cannot see any foreign-language sources that are denoted as such.
    • I used a plagiarism checker, and the text does not appear to have been copied without attribution (i.e. it is original text).
    • The article has a neutral POV.
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Now the original hook is good to go. I am not very familiar with doing DYK reviews, so I apologize for any snags. – Epicgenius (talk) 19:26, 30 October 2014 (UTC)