Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/NGC 6067"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Noswall59
(Re)
imported>Noswall59
(Signing)
Line 30: Line 30:
 
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Query: I am not an astronomer and I don't know what you mean by "rich" in this context - could a link be supplied? Otherwise, it's good to go. —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 22:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC).
 
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Query: I am not an astronomer and I don't know what you mean by "rich" in this context - could a link be supplied? Otherwise, it's good to go. —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 22:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC).
 
:: This section of the article [[Open cluster]] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_cluster#Morphology_and_classification) has an explanation of "richness" of clusters.[[User:VirtualDave|VirtualDave]] ([[User talk:VirtualDave|talk]]) 23:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 
:: This section of the article [[Open cluster]] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_cluster#Morphology_and_classification) has an explanation of "richness" of clusters.[[User:VirtualDave|VirtualDave]] ([[User talk:VirtualDave|talk]]) 23:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
:::Okay, so it seems to be more about the "density" of stars. Well, I am not sure that the section you've provided is very explicit, but I think it might be worth providing a link to it in the hook.
+
:::Okay, so it seems to be more about the "density" of stars. Well, I am not sure that the section you've provided is very explicit, but I think it might be worth providing a link to it in the hook. —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 21:41, 20 June 2015 (UTC).
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 21:41, 20 June 2015

NGC 6067

NGC 6067

  • ... that the open cluster NGC 6067 (pictured) is 15 to 20 times as rich as the Pleiades?

5x expanded by Casliber (talk) and VirtualDave (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 15:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC).

  • I will take this one, —Noswall59 (talk) 22:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Prose portion expansion, ~1548 vs. ~277, so expanded enough and large enough (just).
  • Article is: neutral and well cited. It has been run through Earwig's copyvio and is clear ("violation unlikely: 20.6% confidence").
  • QPQ checks out
  • Hook is verified by the source, which is reliable; Well within character limit; and neutral.
  • No images
  • Symbol question.svg Query: I am not an astronomer and I don't know what you mean by "rich" in this context - could a link be supplied? Otherwise, it's good to go. —Noswall59 (talk) 22:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC).
This section of the article Open cluster (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_cluster#Morphology_and_classification) has an explanation of "richness" of clusters.VirtualDave (talk) 23:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Okay, so it seems to be more about the "density" of stars. Well, I am not sure that the section you've provided is very explicit, but I think it might be worth providing a link to it in the hook. —Noswall59 (talk) 21:41, 20 June 2015 (UTC).