Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/NGC 6067"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Noswall59 (Re) |
imported>Noswall59 (Signing) |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Query: I am not an astronomer and I don't know what you mean by "rich" in this context - could a link be supplied? Otherwise, it's good to go. —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 22:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC). | * [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Query: I am not an astronomer and I don't know what you mean by "rich" in this context - could a link be supplied? Otherwise, it's good to go. —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 22:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC). | ||
:: This section of the article [[Open cluster]] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_cluster#Morphology_and_classification) has an explanation of "richness" of clusters.[[User:VirtualDave|VirtualDave]] ([[User talk:VirtualDave|talk]]) 23:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC) | :: This section of the article [[Open cluster]] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_cluster#Morphology_and_classification) has an explanation of "richness" of clusters.[[User:VirtualDave|VirtualDave]] ([[User talk:VirtualDave|talk]]) 23:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::Okay, so it seems to be more about the "density" of stars. Well, I am not sure that the section you've provided is very explicit, but I think it might be worth providing a link to it in the hook. | + | :::Okay, so it seems to be more about the "density" of stars. Well, I am not sure that the section you've provided is very explicit, but I think it might be worth providing a link to it in the hook. —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 21:41, 20 June 2015 (UTC). |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 21:41, 20 June 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
NGC 6067
5x expanded by Casliber (talk) and VirtualDave (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 15:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC).
- Prose portion expansion, ~1548 vs. ~277, so expanded enough and large enough (just).
- Article is: neutral and well cited. It has been run through Earwig's copyvio and is clear ("violation unlikely: 20.6% confidence").
- QPQ checks out
- Hook is verified by the source, which is reliable; Well within character limit; and neutral.
- No images
Query: I am not an astronomer and I don't know what you mean by "rich" in this context - could a link be supplied? Otherwise, it's good to go. —Noswall59 (talk) 22:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC).
- This section of the article Open cluster (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_cluster#Morphology_and_classification) has an explanation of "richness" of clusters.VirtualDave (talk) 23:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
