Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/NGC 6067"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Noswall59
(Signing)
imported>Casliber
(yeah, I linked it - tempting to say "more stars" but it's sorta "more stars" and "denser" and stuff, so best to just link....folks'll get the idea...)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that the open cluster '''[[NGC 6067]]''' ''(pictured)'' is 15 to 20 times as rich as the [[Pleiades]]?
+
* ... that the open cluster '''[[NGC 6067]]''' ''(pictured)'' is 15 to 20 times as [[Open_cluster#Morphology_and_classification|rich]] as the [[Pleiades]]?
  
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bulverket]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bulverket]]
Line 31: Line 31:
 
:: This section of the article [[Open cluster]] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_cluster#Morphology_and_classification) has an explanation of "richness" of clusters.[[User:VirtualDave|VirtualDave]] ([[User talk:VirtualDave|talk]]) 23:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 
:: This section of the article [[Open cluster]] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_cluster#Morphology_and_classification) has an explanation of "richness" of clusters.[[User:VirtualDave|VirtualDave]] ([[User talk:VirtualDave|talk]]) 23:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 
:::Okay, so it seems to be more about the "density" of stars. Well, I am not sure that the section you've provided is very explicit, but I think it might be worth providing a link to it in the hook. —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 21:41, 20 June 2015 (UTC).
 
:::Okay, so it seems to be more about the "density" of stars. Well, I am not sure that the section you've provided is very explicit, but I think it might be worth providing a link to it in the hook. —[[User:Noswall59|Noswall59]] ([[User talk:Noswall59|talk]]) 21:41, 20 June 2015 (UTC).
 +
::::yeah, I linked it - tempting to say "more stars" but it's sorta "more stars" and "denser" and stuff, so best to just link....folks'll get the idea...[[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 22:43, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 22:43, 20 June 2015

NGC 6067

NGC 6067

5x expanded by Casliber (talk) and VirtualDave (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 15:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC).

  • I will take this one, —Noswall59 (talk) 22:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Prose portion expansion, ~1548 vs. ~277, so expanded enough and large enough (just).
  • Article is: neutral and well cited. It has been run through Earwig's copyvio and is clear ("violation unlikely: 20.6% confidence").
  • QPQ checks out
  • Hook is verified by the source, which is reliable; Well within character limit; and neutral.
  • No images
  • Symbol question.svg Query: I am not an astronomer and I don't know what you mean by "rich" in this context - could a link be supplied? Otherwise, it's good to go. —Noswall59 (talk) 22:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC).
This section of the article Open cluster (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_cluster#Morphology_and_classification) has an explanation of "richness" of clusters.VirtualDave (talk) 23:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Okay, so it seems to be more about the "density" of stars. Well, I am not sure that the section you've provided is very explicit, but I think it might be worth providing a link to it in the hook. —Noswall59 (talk) 21:41, 20 June 2015 (UTC).
yeah, I linked it - tempting to say "more stars" but it's sorta "more stars" and "denser" and stuff, so best to just link....folks'll get the idea...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:43, 20 June 2015 (UTC)