Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Nankangia"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Casliber
(FWIW I like ALT1)
imported>Rcsprinter123
(approved, moved to prep area 3)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from November 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=November 2013
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by <font color="#151B8D">'''[[User:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:cambria; font-size:10pt; color:#151B8D">Rcsprinter</span>]] </font><font color="#151B8D"> ''' [[User talk:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:calibri; font-size:8pt; color:#488AC7">(constabulary)</span>]]</font> <small>@</small> 18:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)<br />}}
 
{{DYKC}}
 
{{DYKC}}
 
====Nankangia====
 
====Nankangia====
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
 
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
 
[[File:Nankangia Restoration.jpg|100x100px|restoration of Nankangia]]
 
[[File:Nankangia Restoration.jpg|100x100px|restoration of Nankangia]]
</div><!-- 
+
</div>
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that the dinosaur '''''[[Nankangia]]''''' ''(pictured)'' might have been carnivorous or herbivorous?
 
* ... that the dinosaur '''''[[Nankangia]]''''' ''(pictured)'' might have been carnivorous or herbivorous?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Alec Lazenby]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Alec Lazenby]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Rnnsh|Rnnsh]] ([[User talk:Rnnsh|talk]]), [[User:MWAK|MWAK]] ([[User talk:MWAK|talk]]), [[User:Animalparty|Animalparty]] ([[User talk:Animalparty|talk]]).&nbsp;Nominated by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) at 12:54, 29 November 2013 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Rnnsh|Rnnsh]] ([[User talk:Rnnsh|talk]]), [[User:MWAK|MWAK]] ([[User talk:MWAK|talk]]), [[User:Animalparty|Animalparty]] ([[User talk:Animalparty|talk]]).&nbsp;Nominated by [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]]) at 12:54, 29 November 2013 (UTC)</small>.
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Nankangia|Rnnsh}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Nankangia|MWAK}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Nankangia|Animalparty}}
 
* {{DYKnom|Nankangia|Casliber}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*Well, I'm not reviewing it (as it's probably not appropriate), but I don't like the hook... I mean, most animals are carnivorous and herbivorous to some degree, and we don't really know what most extinct ones preferred to eat (if we don't have their jaws)... An alternative hook: that the dinosaur '''''[[Nankangia]]''''' ''(pictured)'' coexisted with at least four members of its family, some of which may have been more herbivorous than carnivorous? I should note that, as Lü ''et al.'' (2013) didn't redefine Oviraptoridae, ''Nankangia'' should be considered an oviraptorid as well... [[User:Rnnsh|Rnnsh]] ([[User talk:Rnnsh|talk]]) 16:48, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 
:*Well, I'm not reviewing it (as it's probably not appropriate), but I don't like the hook... I mean, most animals are carnivorous and herbivorous to some degree, and we don't really know what most extinct ones preferred to eat (if we don't have their jaws)... An alternative hook: that the dinosaur '''''[[Nankangia]]''''' ''(pictured)'' coexisted with at least four members of its family, some of which may have been more herbivorous than carnivorous? I should note that, as Lü ''et al.'' (2013) didn't redefine Oviraptoridae, ''Nankangia'' should be considered an oviraptorid as well... [[User:Rnnsh|Rnnsh]] ([[User talk:Rnnsh|talk]]) 16:48, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Line 31: Line 19:
 
:::::*FWIW I like ALT1 [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 13:33, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 
:::::*FWIW I like ALT1 [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 13:33, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Article newness and length are both good.  Alt 1 Hook fact and reference are good.  Pay-wall reference taken agf and image status is good. No policy issues identified. Good to go.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 06:51, 5 December 2013 (UTC)  
 
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Article newness and length are both good.  Alt 1 Hook fact and reference are good.  Pay-wall reference taken agf and image status is good. No policy issues identified. Good to go.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 06:51, 5 December 2013 (UTC)  
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
*I've approved it but am not using the image because it is not high enough quality for the main page. <font color="#151B8D">'''[[User:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:cambria; font-size:10pt; color:#151B8D">Rcsprinter</span>]] </font><font color="#151B8D"> ''' [[User talk:Rcsprinter123|<span style="font-family:calibri; font-size:8pt; color:#488AC7">(constabulary)</span>]]</font> <small>@</small> 18:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 +
{{-}}{{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 18:28, 7 December 2013

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rcsprinter (constabulary) @ 18:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Nankangia

  • ... that the dinosaur Nankangia (pictured) might have been carnivorous or herbivorous?

Created by Rnnsh (talk), MWAK (talk), Animalparty (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 12:54, 29 November 2013 (UTC).

  • Well, I'm not reviewing it (as it's probably not appropriate), but I don't like the hook... I mean, most animals are carnivorous and herbivorous to some degree, and we don't really know what most extinct ones preferred to eat (if we don't have their jaws)... An alternative hook: that the dinosaur Nankangia (pictured) coexisted with at least four members of its family, some of which may have been more herbivorous than carnivorous? I should note that, as Lü et al. (2013) didn't redefine Oviraptoridae, Nankangia should be considered an oviraptorid as well... Rnnsh (talk) 16:48, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Ok - any better ideas? I thought it was interesting as carnivorous/herbivorous dinos are always well-demarcated...Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
  • I'm suggesting ALT1 ... that it is unknown whether the dinosaur Nankangia (pictured) was carnivorous or herbivorous? Also, I think the image has been linked wrongly, or deleted. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:46, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
  • The image filename was incompletely specified. I've fixed it. MANdARAX  XAЯAbИAM 19:56, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
  • 16px Article newness and length are both good. Alt 1 Hook fact and reference are good. Pay-wall reference taken agf and image status is good. No policy issues identified. Good to go.--Kevmin § 06:51, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
  • I've approved it but am not using the image because it is not high enough quality for the main page. Rcsprinter (constabulary) @ 18:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)