Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Nanticoke Creek"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yerpo
(review)
imported>Yerpo
m (+sig)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Length and date verified, although the Hydrology section is hard to follow and some data would be better presented in a table, IMO. This would make the article shorter, but still long enough for DYK. No copyright problems detected and sources are good. Hook fact accepted on good faith, although it's somewhat vague. Why erroneous? The reference should also include precise page number(s). I propose the following alt hook which I think is more interesting:
 
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Length and date verified, although the Hydrology section is hard to follow and some data would be better presented in a table, IMO. This would make the article shorter, but still long enough for DYK. No copyright problems detected and sources are good. Hook fact accepted on good faith, although it's somewhat vague. Why erroneous? The reference should also include precise page number(s). I propose the following alt hook which I think is more interesting:
 
:::'''ALT''' That [[mining]] has substantially altered the [[hydrology]] and topography of the '''[[Nanticoke Creek]]'s''' watershed?
 
:::'''ALT''' That [[mining]] has substantially altered the [[hydrology]] and topography of the '''[[Nanticoke Creek]]'s''' watershed?
 +
::— [[User:Yerpo|Yerpo]] <sup>[[User talk:Yerpo|Eh?]]</sup> 16:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 16:37, 21 March 2015

Nanticoke Creek

  • ... that Nanticoke Creek has been erroneously referred to as Lee's Creek, Miller's Creek, Robbins Creek, Bobbs Creek, Rummage Creek, and Warrior Run Creek?

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 14:35, 15 March 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg Length and date verified, although the Hydrology section is hard to follow and some data would be better presented in a table, IMO. This would make the article shorter, but still long enough for DYK. No copyright problems detected and sources are good. Hook fact accepted on good faith, although it's somewhat vague. Why erroneous? The reference should also include precise page number(s). I propose the following alt hook which I think is more interesting:
ALT That mining has substantially altered the hydrology and topography of the Nanticoke Creek's watershed?
Yerpo Eh? 16:37, 21 March 2015 (UTC)