Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Nathan Cohen (rower)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Antidiskriminator (tick citation issue) |
imported>Larry Hockett (cmt) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:* The article is long enough. Expansion began on 29 October 2013, which means it is also new enough. QPQ has been done. The hook is not too long (121 characters) and is properly cited, though not immediatelly after hook assertion, but at the end of paragraph.{{tick}} The article contains a dozen single sentence paragraphs which inhibit the flow of the text and should be avoided per [[MOS:LINEBREAKS]] (this is just an improvement opportunity, not affecting this review). Just a thought (also without affect on the review): is it better to use past tense in case of irregular heartbeat, since he does not have all the time irregular heartbeat and also he is working with medical specialists to determine how to treat it when it occur? Since I don't have an OTRS account I would appreciate if editor who would promote this nomination could double-check to confirm the permission. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go (note: please someone who has OTRS account check OTRS permission before promoting this hook together with image). --[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 11:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC) | :* The article is long enough. Expansion began on 29 October 2013, which means it is also new enough. QPQ has been done. The hook is not too long (121 characters) and is properly cited, though not immediatelly after hook assertion, but at the end of paragraph.{{tick}} The article contains a dozen single sentence paragraphs which inhibit the flow of the text and should be avoided per [[MOS:LINEBREAKS]] (this is just an improvement opportunity, not affecting this review). Just a thought (also without affect on the review): is it better to use past tense in case of irregular heartbeat, since he does not have all the time irregular heartbeat and also he is working with medical specialists to determine how to treat it when it occur? Since I don't have an OTRS account I would appreciate if editor who would promote this nomination could double-check to confirm the permission. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go (note: please someone who has OTRS account check OTRS permission before promoting this hook together with image). --[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 11:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
::*As to the tense, irregular heartbeat is a condition -- one that he has -- which is why present tense is appropriate. As to checking OTRS permission, if that is required by all means do so, but I think that's unusual as a DYK review request.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 15:18, 1 November 2013 (UTC) | ::*As to the tense, irregular heartbeat is a condition -- one that he has -- which is why present tense is appropriate. As to checking OTRS permission, if that is required by all means do so, but I think that's unusual as a DYK review request.--[[User:Epeefleche|Epeefleche]] ([[User talk:Epeefleche|talk]]) 15:18, 1 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::*To me the verb tense isn't an issue, but most of the time people with SVT have regular heartbeats, both day-to-day and during SVT episodes. The issue usually isn't an irregular rhythm, but just a very fast rate. [[Cardiac dysrhythmia]] is a better descriptor, but may be too technical for DYK. I don't know... if the sources use irregular, we might be stuck with that, even though it's not quite right. [[User:EricEnfermero|<font face ="Cambria" color="maroon">'''EricEnfermero'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:EricEnfermero|<font face= "Cambria" color="black">'''HOWDY!'''</font>]]</sup> 03:03, 2 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 03:03, 2 November 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nathan Cohen (rower)
- ... that New Zealand rower Nathan Cohen (pictured), Olympic champion and two-time world champion, has an irregular heartbeat?
- Reviewed: Myer Feldman
5x expanded by Epeefleche (talk). Self nominated at 20:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC).
- The article is long enough. Expansion began on 29 October 2013, which means it is also new enough. QPQ has been done. The hook is not too long (121 characters) and is properly cited, though not immediatelly after hook assertion, but at the end of paragraph.
The article contains a dozen single sentence paragraphs which inhibit the flow of the text and should be avoided per MOS:LINEBREAKS (this is just an improvement opportunity, not affecting this review). Just a thought (also without affect on the review): is it better to use past tense in case of irregular heartbeat, since he does not have all the time irregular heartbeat and also he is working with medical specialists to determine how to treat it when it occur? Since I don't have an OTRS account I would appreciate if editor who would promote this nomination could double-check to confirm the permission.
Good to go (note: please someone who has OTRS account check OTRS permission before promoting this hook together with image). --Antidiskriminator (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
- As to the tense, irregular heartbeat is a condition -- one that he has -- which is why present tense is appropriate. As to checking OTRS permission, if that is required by all means do so, but I think that's unusual as a DYK review request.--Epeefleche (talk) 15:18, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
- To me the verb tense isn't an issue, but most of the time people with SVT have regular heartbeats, both day-to-day and during SVT episodes. The issue usually isn't an irregular rhythm, but just a very fast rate. Cardiac dysrhythmia is a better descriptor, but may be too technical for DYK. I don't know... if the sources use irregular, we might be stuck with that, even though it's not quite right. EricEnfermero HOWDY! 03:03, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- The article is long enough. Expansion began on 29 October 2013, which means it is also new enough. QPQ has been done. The hook is not too long (121 characters) and is properly cited, though not immediatelly after hook assertion, but at the end of paragraph.
