Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/National Strategic Computing Initiative"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Antony-22 (re) |
imported>Yoninah (pinging BlueMoonset) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] 5x expansion verified. New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. ALT1 is interesting, but the source to which it is cited is a video that has been taken down from the website. Do you have another source? QPQ done. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC) | :::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] 5x expansion verified. New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. ALT1 is interesting, but the source to which it is cited is a video that has been taken down from the website. Do you have another source? QPQ done. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::::Well, that's annoying. It was there when I checked a few days ago. It doesn't seem to be mentioned in other sources, unfortunately. What's the policy on dead links as sources, do they count as an AGF for an offline source? [[User:Antony-22|Antony–'''''22''''']] (<sup>[[User talk:Antony-22|talk]]</sup>⁄<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Antony-22|contribs]]</sub>) 01:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC) | :::::Well, that's annoying. It was there when I checked a few days ago. It doesn't seem to be mentioned in other sources, unfortunately. What's the policy on dead links as sources, do they count as an AGF for an offline source? [[User:Antony-22|Antony–'''''22''''']] (<sup>[[User talk:Antony-22|talk]]</sup>⁄<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Antony-22|contribs]]</sub>) 01:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::::I'm not sure. {{ping|BlueMoonset}}? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:01, 10 May 2016 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 21:01, 10 May 2016
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
National Strategic Computing Initiative
... that the U. S. National Strategic Computing Initiative envisions new high-performance computing efforts in the Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Institutes of Health, and Department of Homeland Security?
- Reviewed: Hypercycle (chemistry)
5x expanded by Antony-22 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC).
- The hook is kind of dull. Any suggested alts? Neutralitytalk 04:17, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that the U. S. National Strategic Computing Initiative's Implementation Plan has not been released to the public to avoid preempting higher-level budgetary planning? Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 04:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
5x expansion verified. New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. ALT1 is interesting, but the source to which it is cited is a video that has been taken down from the website. Do you have another source? QPQ done. Yoninah (talk) 22:43, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well, that's annoying. It was there when I checked a few days ago. It doesn't seem to be mentioned in other sources, unfortunately. What's the policy on dead links as sources, do they count as an AGF for an offline source? Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 01:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. Template:Ping? Yoninah (talk) 21:01, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Well, that's annoying. It was there when I checked a few days ago. It doesn't seem to be mentioned in other sources, unfortunately. What's the policy on dead links as sources, do they count as an AGF for an offline source? Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 01:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)