Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Naughty Boy"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mandarax
m (Deal or No Deal → Deal or No Deal (UK game show))
imported>Panyd
(Let's do this thing)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
:Second problem, there's close paraphrasing in this article from the sources. Just looking at one source [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FNaughty_Boy&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thisislocallondon.co.uk%2Fnews%2F4528790.Watford_producer_scores_chart_hit%2F&minwords=4&minchars=13 here] shows a phrase lifted from the source. I'm not the best judge of this so it would be very good to get a second opinion, but even just changing a few phrases should fix the problem. [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 17:51, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 
:Second problem, there's close paraphrasing in this article from the sources. Just looking at one source [http://toolserver.org/~dcoetzee/duplicationdetector/compare.php?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FNaughty_Boy&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thisislocallondon.co.uk%2Fnews%2F4528790.Watford_producer_scores_chart_hit%2F&minwords=4&minchars=13 here] shows a phrase lifted from the source. I'm not the best judge of this so it would be very good to get a second opinion, but even just changing a few phrases should fix the problem. [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 17:51, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 
::Agree with ALT-1, as for close pharaphrasing - erm I've quoted the text using quotation marks. The reference is part interview and part written prose. It was my understanding that if you quote something from another source this is allowed so long as quotation marks are used. This happens quite often in music-related articles. We have critical reception sections which directly quote reviews. As many of these are passed as [[WP:GA|good articles]] I didn't see this as an issue. &mdash; [[User:Lil-unique1|<font color="DarkRed">'''Lil_<font color="red">℧</font>niquℇ <font color="red">№</font>1</font>]] [[User talk: Lil-unique1|'''<font color="Black"><sup>[talk]</sup></font>''']] 19:50, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 
::Agree with ALT-1, as for close pharaphrasing - erm I've quoted the text using quotation marks. The reference is part interview and part written prose. It was my understanding that if you quote something from another source this is allowed so long as quotation marks are used. This happens quite often in music-related articles. We have critical reception sections which directly quote reviews. As many of these are passed as [[WP:GA|good articles]] I didn't see this as an issue. &mdash; [[User:Lil-unique1|<font color="DarkRed">'''Lil_<font color="red">℧</font>niquℇ <font color="red">№</font>1</font>]] [[User talk: Lil-unique1|'''<font color="Black"><sup>[talk]</sup></font>''']] 19:50, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
 
+
:[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Sounds good to me! Like I said, not really a good paraphrasing person. [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 21:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 21:04, 3 September 2012

Naughty Boy

Created/expanded by Lil-unique1 (talk). Self nom at 00:55, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol possible vote.svg - There are two things wrong with this nomination, neither insurmountable but it does mean this cannot go up in its current form. Firstly, really cool fact which is sourced, but it's kind of lying by omission. It wasn't just deal or no deal. Why not have:
ALT 1 - ... that British record producer Shahid "Naughty Boy" Khan started his career by winning twice in one year, once for the Prince's Trust and then on Deal or No Deal?
It's a bit unwieldy but it seems silly to omit something crucial just to make an interesting hook.
Second problem, there's close paraphrasing in this article from the sources. Just looking at one source here shows a phrase lifted from the source. I'm not the best judge of this so it would be very good to get a second opinion, but even just changing a few phrases should fix the problem. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 17:51, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Agree with ALT-1, as for close pharaphrasing - erm I've quoted the text using quotation marks. The reference is part interview and part written prose. It was my understanding that if you quote something from another source this is allowed so long as quotation marks are used. This happens quite often in music-related articles. We have critical reception sections which directly quote reviews. As many of these are passed as good articles I didn't see this as an issue. — Lil_niquℇ 1 [talk] 19:50, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg Sounds good to me! Like I said, not really a good paraphrasing person. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 21:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)