Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Neil Alexander"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Kosack
(+ reply)
imported>EdChem
(replies)
Line 42: Line 42:
 
::Note, this comment does not detract in any way from the quality of the review by IndianBio or its suitability for QPQ credit.  [[User:EdChem|EdChem]] ([[User talk:EdChem|talk]]) 06:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 
::Note, this comment does not detract in any way from the quality of the review by IndianBio or its suitability for QPQ credit.  [[User:EdChem|EdChem]] ([[User talk:EdChem|talk]]) 06:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 
::: {{reply to|EdChem}} Yeah I agree with your point. I was unsure whether to include the last part about the injury myself but stuck with it in the end. If you think it's more suitable, I'm happy to go with the alt. [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]) 06:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 
::: {{reply to|EdChem}} Yeah I agree with your point. I was unsure whether to include the last part about the injury myself but stuck with it in the end. If you think it's more suitable, I'm happy to go with the alt. [[User:Kosack|Kosack]] ([[User talk:Kosack|talk]]) 06:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 +
::::{{ping|IndianBio}} what's your view on the hook?<br />{{ping|Kosack}} thanks for your response.  I can't give a tick approving ALT1 as I am the one who suggested it.  IndianBio can approve it, or could approve both and leave the choice to the promoter, or raise an objection.  At this point, it's his call.  [[User:EdChem|EdChem]] ([[User talk:EdChem|talk]]) 07:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 07:05, 7 December 2016

Neil Alexander

Improved to Good Article status by Kosack (talk). Self-nominated at 18:42, 1 December 2016 (UTC).

  • Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
Template:Reply to I've fixed the sourcing issue now so should be ok. Kosack (talk) 12:52, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Kosack, the hook is now good to be promoted. —IB [ Poke ] 13:19, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping I think that the hook has too much information to be effectively hooky. You are hinting at an interesting question – why would a player come on as a substitute for the opposite team? – and that would be a reason to click the link and read the article. Then, however, you give the answer – that it was a friendly and their goalkeeper was injured. I suggest a hook like:
  • (ALT1) ... that in 2010, footballer Neil Alexander came on as a substitute for Queen of the South against his own team, the Rangers?
What do you think? EdChem (talk) 06:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Note, this comment does not detract in any way from the quality of the review by IndianBio or its suitability for QPQ credit. EdChem (talk) 06:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:Reply to Yeah I agree with your point. I was unsure whether to include the last part about the injury myself but stuck with it in the end. If you think it's more suitable, I'm happy to go with the alt. Kosack (talk) 06:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Template:Ping what's your view on the hook?
Template:Ping thanks for your response. I can't give a tick approving ALT1 as I am the one who suggested it. IndianBio can approve it, or could approve both and leave the choice to the promoter, or raise an objection. At this point, it's his call. EdChem (talk) 07:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)