Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Neutrois"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(looks like article won't be long enough for DYK)
imported>BlueMoonset
(closing; article too short to qualify for DYK)
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 
:::*Sometimes there just isn't enough information available from reliable sources to get an article beyond a stub. It happens. If there aren't more sources, then the article won't be long enough to qualify for DYK, and the nomination should probably be closed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 04:26, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 
:::*Sometimes there just isn't enough information available from reliable sources to get an article beyond a stub. It happens. If there aren't more sources, then the article won't be long enough to qualify for DYK, and the nomination should probably be closed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 04:26, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
:*[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] It has been another week, and no additional information has been added to the article. Closing as unsuccessful; the article remains far too short to meet DYK minimum standards. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 00:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 00:42, 9 March 2014

Neutrois

Created by Theparties (talk). Self nominated at 11:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC).

  • 16px - good start but I suspect this isn't 1500 chars yet Victuallers (talk) 14:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  • I've reverted you. The source you cited did not even mention the neutrois identity. J Milburn (talk) 17:44, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
  • 16px The article has only 806 prose characters, far short of the minimum 1500 required, and it's now two weeks from its initial nomination and review. There needs to be concerted action to bring this article in line with DYK requirements soon: length, neutrality, sourcing (hook and article), close paraphrasing, etc. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:04, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
  • I had been trying to find more sources to add content but to little avail.--Theparties (talk) 03:47, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Sometimes there just isn't enough information available from reliable sources to get an article beyond a stub. It happens. If there aren't more sources, then the article won't be long enough to qualify for DYK, and the nomination should probably be closed. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:26, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
  • 16px It has been another week, and no additional information has been added to the article. Closing as unsuccessful; the article remains far too short to meet DYK minimum standards. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)