Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Nicolae Fleva"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Dahn |
imported>Gerda Arendt (appr) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
::::*I can see "supporter", but not "prominent", perhaps a language problem? --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 23:32, 28 November 2011 (UTC) | ::::*I can see "supporter", but not "prominent", perhaps a language problem? --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 23:32, 28 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::::*I'm not (supposed to be) parroting the sources. The man was a prominent politician, was invited to lead a Germanophile daily, ended up editing another, plus sources indicate that there was enough public scrutiny of his activities for the controversy to continue after the war. Also note that even fellow Germanophiles argue that he was being paid quite a lot for his purported services. To just say that he was a supporter, IMHO, is a bland hook, and to say that he was prominent does in fact reflect the sources. Meaning that he was better known to the public than some of the other Germanophiles. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn|talk]]) 23:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC) | :::::*I'm not (supposed to be) parroting the sources. The man was a prominent politician, was invited to lead a Germanophile daily, ended up editing another, plus sources indicate that there was enough public scrutiny of his activities for the controversy to continue after the war. Also note that even fellow Germanophiles argue that he was being paid quite a lot for his purported services. To just say that he was a supporter, IMHO, is a bland hook, and to say that he was prominent does in fact reflect the sources. Meaning that he was better known to the public than some of the other Germanophiles. [[User:Dahn|Dahn]] ([[User talk:Dahn|talk]]) 23:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::::*You made me understand better, thank you. | ||
| + | ::::::[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] (for Romanian sources) All three hooks possible and good to go, --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 23:58, 28 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 23:58, 28 November 2011
Nicolae Fleva
- ... that Nicolae Fleva, who was once shot at by a Romanian Prime Minister in office, allegedly sold his loyalty to the Central Powers at age 75?
- Reviewed: Manasse ǃNoreseb
- ALT 1: "... that Nicolae Fleva, who helped prepare Romania's independence in 1877, allegedly sold his loyalty to the Central Powers in 1915?"
Created/expanded by Dahn (talk). Self nom at 08:26, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Please hold this for December 1, Romania's national holiday. Thanks. Dahn (talk) 08:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Excellent, detailed, many sources. But I am not so happy with the hook part (in both) which deals with with something alleged. I am sure you can find something factual, to continue the shooting start, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- This is because, again, I wanted to add something that relates to his WWI activity. The "alleged" is an extra precaution on my part: the sources are quite adamant that he at the very least did something fishy at the time. But okay, how about:
- ALT 2: ... that Nicolae Fleva, who was once shot at by a Romanian Prime Minister in office, became a prominent supporter of the Central Powers at age 75? Dahn (talk) 23:04, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- I can see "supporter", but not "prominent", perhaps a language problem? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:32, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- I'm not (supposed to be) parroting the sources. The man was a prominent politician, was invited to lead a Germanophile daily, ended up editing another, plus sources indicate that there was enough public scrutiny of his activities for the controversy to continue after the war. Also note that even fellow Germanophiles argue that he was being paid quite a lot for his purported services. To just say that he was a supporter, IMHO, is a bland hook, and to say that he was prominent does in fact reflect the sources. Meaning that he was better known to the public than some of the other Germanophiles. Dahn (talk) 23:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- You made me understand better, thank you.
(for Romanian sources) All three hooks possible and good to go, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:58, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- This is because, again, I wanted to add something that relates to his WWI activity. The "alleged" is an extra precaution on my part: the sources are quite adamant that he at the very least did something fishy at the time. But okay, how about: