Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Non-constituency Member of Parliament"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hawkeye7
(Good to go.)
imported>Allen3
(to prep1)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from November 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=November 2012
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by ''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 02:09, 13 November 2012 (UTC)<br />}}
 
====Non-constituency Member of Parliament====
 
====Non-constituency Member of Parliament====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Non-constituency Member of Parliament|Non-constituency Member of Parliament}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Non-constituency Member of Parliament|Non-constituency Member of Parliament}}
<!-- 
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
{{*mp}}... that former [[Singapore]]an [[Prime Minister of Singapore|Prime Minister]] [[Lee Kuan Yew]] said that the '''[[Non-constituency Member of Parliament]]''' scheme should be introduced to show younger voters how destructive an opposition can be?
 
{{*mp}}... that former [[Singapore]]an [[Prime Minister of Singapore|Prime Minister]] [[Lee Kuan Yew]] said that the '''[[Non-constituency Member of Parliament]]''' scheme should be introduced to show younger voters how destructive an opposition can be?
 
{{*mp}}'''ALT 1''': ... that an opposition candidate in a [[Singapore]] [[parliamentary elections in Singapore|general election]] who is one of the best performing losers can be declared elected as a '''[[Non-constituency Member of Parliament]]'''?
 
{{*mp}}'''ALT 1''': ... that an opposition candidate in a [[Singapore]] [[parliamentary elections in Singapore|general election]] who is one of the best performing losers can be declared elected as a '''[[Non-constituency Member of Parliament]]'''?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Shinsarugakuki|Shinsarugakuki]]
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Shinsarugakuki|Shinsarugakuki]]
 
:*''Comment'': The article was expanded by at least five times on 1 November 2012. The main hook is referenced by footnote 23, and "ALT 1" by footnotes 8 and 11.
 
:*''Comment'': The article was expanded by at least five times on 1 November 2012. The main hook is referenced by footnote 23, and "ALT 1" by footnotes 8 and 11.
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Vsion|Vsion]] ([[User talk:Vsion|talk]]), [[User:Abigail.kor|Abigail.kor]] ([[User talk:Abigail.kor|talk]]), [[User:Jmwee|Jmwee]] ([[User talk:Jmwee|talk]]), and [[User:Viviansiah|Viviansiah]] ([[User talk:Viviansiah|talk]]).  Nominated by [[User:Smuconlaw|Smuconlaw]] ([[User talk:Smuconlaw|talk]]) at 18:10, 1 November 2012 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded  by [[User:Vsion|Vsion]] ([[User talk:Vsion|talk]]), [[User:Abigail.kor|Abigail.kor]] ([[User talk:Abigail.kor|talk]]), [[User:Jmwee|Jmwee]] ([[User talk:Jmwee|talk]]), and [[User:Viviansiah|Viviansiah]] ([[User talk:Viviansiah|talk]]).  Nominated by [[User:Smuconlaw|Smuconlaw]] ([[User talk:Smuconlaw|talk]]) at 18:10, 1 November 2012 (UTC)</small>
<!--
 
*{{DYKmake|Non-constituency Member of Parliament|Vsion}}
 
*{{DYKmake|Non-constituency Member of Parliament|Abigail.kor}}
 
*{{DYKmake|Non-constituency Member of Parliament|Jmwee}}
 
*{{DYKmake|Non-constituency Member of Parliament|Viviansiah}}
 
*{{DYKnom|Non-constituency Member of Parliament|Smuconlaw}}
 
-->
 
  
:*<!--Make first comment here-->
+
:*
 
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article has a few fact tags that need cleaning.
 
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article has a few fact tags that need cleaning.
 
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is expanded enough and new enough.  Both hooks are properly formatted.  All images appear to have acceptable copyrights. Hooked facts both appear in article and supported by sources.  Article appears neutral enough to some one not familiar with Singapore politics. Spot check of sources reveals no major causes for concerns for plagiarism.
 
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is expanded enough and new enough.  Both hooks are properly formatted.  All images appear to have acceptable copyrights. Hooked facts both appear in article and supported by sources.  Article appears neutral enough to some one not familiar with Singapore politics. Spot check of sources reveals no major causes for concerns for plagiarism.
Line 35: Line 21:
 
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]  Article still not fully supported by sources. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 20:43, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 
* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]  Article still not fully supported by sources. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 20:43, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 
::{{tick}} '''Fixed'''. — [[User:Smuconlaw|SMUconlaw]] ([[User talk:Smuconlaw|talk]]) 08:21, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
 
::{{tick}} '''Fixed'''. — [[User:Smuconlaw|SMUconlaw]] ([[User talk:Smuconlaw|talk]]) 08:21, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. [[User:Hawkeye7|Hawkeye7]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye7|talk]]) 20:21, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
+
::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. [[User:Hawkeye7|Hawkeye7]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye7|talk]]) 20:21, 12 November 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Revision as of 02:09, 13 November 2012

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 02:09, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Non-constituency Member of Parliament

  • Reviewed: Shinsarugakuki
  • Comment: The article was expanded by at least five times on 1 November 2012. The main hook is referenced by footnote 23, and "ALT 1" by footnotes 8 and 11.

Created/expanded by Vsion (talk), Abigail.kor (talk), Jmwee (talk), and Viviansiah (talk). Nominated by Smuconlaw (talk) at 18:10, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol question.svg Article has a few fact tags that need cleaning.
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Article is expanded enough and new enough. Both hooks are properly formatted. All images appear to have acceptable copyrights. Hooked facts both appear in article and supported by sources. Article appears neutral enough to some one not familiar with Singapore politics. Spot check of sources reveals no major causes for concerns for plagiarism.
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Offline sources and paywall sources support the text and were not plagiarised to write. --LauraHale (talk) 22:17, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Symbol question.svg Fix fact tags and then good to go with main hook, which I find a bit more interesting. --LauraHale (talk) 22:17, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

I've provided one reference and removed the other {{fact}} tag – you placed it at the end of a sentence which is really just an introduction to what follows so I think it's unnecessary. — SMUconlaw (talk) 17:09, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Article still not fully supported by sources. --LauraHale (talk) 20:43, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
☑Y Fixed. — SMUconlaw (talk) 08:21, 11 November 2012 (UTC)