Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Nonmagmatic meteorite"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Arb (ALT1) |
imported>Intelligentsium (OK) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
*'''ALT1''': ... that '''[[Nonmagmatic meteorite|nonmagmatic]]''' is a term used in [[meteoritics]] to describe [[iron meteorite]]s that were originally thought to have formed by non-[[igneous]] processes? | *'''ALT1''': ... that '''[[Nonmagmatic meteorite|nonmagmatic]]''' is a term used in [[meteoritics]] to describe [[iron meteorite]]s that were originally thought to have formed by non-[[igneous]] processes? | ||
And drop the picture which makes the wording very awkward while adding no real value. [[User:Arb|-Arb.]] ([[User talk:Arb|talk]]) 13:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | And drop the picture which makes the wording very awkward while adding no real value. [[User:Arb|-Arb.]] ([[User talk:Arb|talk]]) 13:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Date, length, hook check out. Can't really tell much from the pic - to me (a non-meteoriticist, admittedly) it looks like any other rock. <font style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'">[[User:Intelligentsium|<span style="color:#013220">Intelligent</span>]]'''[[User_talk:Intelligentsium|<span style="color:Black">sium</span>]]'''</font> 00:37, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 00:37, 6 January 2013
Nonmagmatic meteorite
- ... that nonmagmatic (example meteorite pictured) is a term used in meteoritics to describe iron meteorites that were originally, mistakenly, thought to have formed by non-igneous processes?
- Reviewed: Exempt; nominating another editor's article
Created by Tobias1984 (talk). Nominated by Arb (talk) at 23:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
- ALT1: ... that nonmagmatic is a term used in meteoritics to describe iron meteorites that were originally thought to have formed by non-igneous processes?
And drop the picture which makes the wording very awkward while adding no real value. -Arb. (talk) 13:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Date, length, hook check out. Can't really tell much from the pic - to me (a non-meteoriticist, admittedly) it looks like any other rock. Intelligentsium 00:37, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
