Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/North Radworthy"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Allen3
(to prep1)
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
 
Line 9: Line 9:
 
[[File:North Molton, Higher North Radworthy - geograph.org.uk - 248817.jpg|100x100px|North Radworthy farm]]
 
[[File:North Molton, Higher North Radworthy - geograph.org.uk - 248817.jpg|100x100px|North Radworthy farm]]
 
</div>
 
</div>
{{*mp}}... that '''[[North Radworthy]]''' and [[South Radworthy]], neighbouring [[Devon]] [[hamlets]], were valued at £3 in 1086?
+
*... that '''[[North Radworthy]]''' and [[South Radworthy]], neighbouring [[Devon]] [[hamlets]], were valued at £3 in 1086?
:{{*mp}} ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/2013 Fonterra recall|2013 Fonterra recall]]
+
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/2013 Fonterra recall|2013 Fonterra recall]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Matt r baker|Matt r baker]] ([[User talk:Matt r baker|talk]]), [[User:Matty.007|Matty.007]] ([[User talk:Matty.007|talk]]).&nbsp;Nominated by [[User:Matty.007|Matty.007]] ([[User talk:Matty.007|talk]]) at 08:40, 9 August 2013 (UTC)</small>.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Matt r baker|Matt r baker]] ([[User talk:Matt r baker|talk]]), [[User:Matty.007|Matty.007]] ([[User talk:Matty.007|talk]]).&nbsp;Nominated by [[User:Matty.007|Matty.007]] ([[User talk:Matty.007|talk]]) at 08:40, 9 August 2013 (UTC)</small>.
  

Latest revision as of 13:13, 7 March 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 23:09, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

North Radworthy

Created by Matt r baker (talk), Matty.007 (talk). Nominated by Matty.007 (talk) at 08:40, 9 August 2013 (UTC).

I have changed the wording, addding South Radworthy. However:

Alt 2: ... that North Radworthy has previously been valued at under £3? Matty.007 11:29, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Comment by nominator: I am away for a few days until Wednesday 14 August, so please be patient, I will not reply until then. Thanks, Matty.007 14:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

16px Length and date are both fine. The article is well referenced throughout and the hook is appropriately referenced to an online, reliable source. Spotchecks reveal no evidence of copyvio or close para-phrasing. I would comment, aside from this review, that the penultimate sentence in the lead: "Despite North Radworthy's size, it has a farm (pictured right), but no schools, or banks." Is a little weird, as no mention is actually made of the specific size, and in fact, given it is described as a hamlet, I would expect it not to have a school or a bank, while a farm is pretty common-place for such locations. But as I say, that it very much outside the remit of this review. Harrias talk 16:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

OK, I will try and remember to fix that soon (next few days). The tick is for alt 3, isn't it Template:U? Thanks for the review, Matty.007 16:46, 4 September 2013 (UTC)