Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Ocasio v. United States"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Notecardforfree
(Fixed quotation marks)
imported>Sainsf
(Reviewed)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :-->
+
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article is long enough, more than 5x expanded within a week before nomination, QPQ done. Earwig's copyvio detector shows some paraphrasing [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Ocasio+v.+United+States&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0], but I believe it is somewhat inevitable here. All hooks are interesting and each is supported by an inline citation. However, I would like to note a few points:
 +
::*"recent" may be confusing, as this refers to early May and now we are heading to early June, and we have no idea when this will appear on the main page.
 +
::*''others have suggested that the case "raise more questions than answers."'' This line in the lead suggests it was not the opinion of "one commentator" as given in ALT1, and indeed is the opinion of just Rory Little as far as I understand. [[User:Sainsf|<span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size: 12pt; color:blue">'''S'''ains'''f'''</span>]] <span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:10pt;color:green">([[User talk:Sainsf|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Sainsf|contribs]])</span> 07:49, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 07:49, 28 May 2016

Ocasio v. United States

5x expanded by Notecardforfree (talk). Self-nominated at 07:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Article is long enough, more than 5x expanded within a week before nomination, QPQ done. Earwig's copyvio detector shows some paraphrasing [1], but I believe it is somewhat inevitable here. All hooks are interesting and each is supported by an inline citation. However, I would like to note a few points:
  • "recent" may be confusing, as this refers to early May and now we are heading to early June, and we have no idea when this will appear on the main page.
  • others have suggested that the case "raise more questions than answers." This line in the lead suggests it was not the opinion of "one commentator" as given in ALT1, and indeed is the opinion of just Rory Little as far as I understand. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 07:49, 28 May 2016 (UTC)