Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Ochetostoma erythrogrammon"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth
 
imported>Nick Moyes
(QPQ review - not quite ready yet.)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:* The article was created within last7 days: {{ok}}
 +
:* The article is long enough: {{ok}}
 +
:* The hook is interesting: {{ok}}
 +
:* The hook is referenced: [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]
 +
:* The hook is below 200 characters: {{ok}}
 +
:* No (0%) copyvio found with Earwig's tool: {{ok}}
 +
:* The article follows most other important policies: {{ok}}
 +
:* QPQ: {{ok}}
 +
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article is nearly good to go. But I think two essential points of clarification are needed. The cited source is a 33-page academic article. Either the citation itself, or the {{tlx|rp}} template should be used to clearly indicate the exact page or pages the commensal names are referenced on. The lack of any wikilinks from common names of the commensals used in the hook make it very difficult to confirm accuracy of that hook. For example, "pea crab" is linked within the DYK article to a page about [[Pinnotheres pisum]], but the cited source ''does not'' indicate this taxon is a commensal of the DYK species, ''O. erythrogrammon'' as far as I can tell. In fact, ''P.pisum'' is not mentioned in the cited source at all, except in the references). The taxonomic names and wikilinks used within the article need to have more precise referencing to the source, and be properly wikilinked to target pages at the most appropriate taxonomic level, and the common names used in the hook needs to be similarly wikilinked to the correct level of groups, too, before this is ready to go. [[User:Nick Moyes|Nick Moyes]] ([[User talk:Nick Moyes|talk]]) 16:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
 +
 
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 16:45, 10 February 2019

Ochetostoma erythrogrammon

  • ... that the burrow of the spoon worm Ochetostoma erythrogrammon may be shared by flatworms, scale worms, molluscs, pea crabs, snapping shrimps and copepods?

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 07:22, 10 February 2019 (UTC).

  • The article was created within last7 days: Template:Ok
  • The article is long enough: Template:Ok
  • The hook is interesting: Template:Ok
  • The hook is referenced: Symbol question.svg
  • The hook is below 200 characters: Template:Ok
  • No (0%) copyvio found with Earwig's tool: Template:Ok
  • The article follows most other important policies: Template:Ok
  • QPQ: Template:Ok
  • Symbol question.svg Article is nearly good to go. But I think two essential points of clarification are needed. The cited source is a 33-page academic article. Either the citation itself, or the {{rp}} template should be used to clearly indicate the exact page or pages the commensal names are referenced on. The lack of any wikilinks from common names of the commensals used in the hook make it very difficult to confirm accuracy of that hook. For example, "pea crab" is linked within the DYK article to a page about Pinnotheres pisum, but the cited source does not indicate this taxon is a commensal of the DYK species, O. erythrogrammon as far as I can tell. In fact, P.pisum is not mentioned in the cited source at all, except in the references). The taxonomic names and wikilinks used within the article need to have more precise referencing to the source, and be properly wikilinked to target pages at the most appropriate taxonomic level, and the common names used in the hook needs to be similarly wikilinked to the correct level of groups, too, before this is ready to go. Nick Moyes (talk) 16:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)