Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Okama Report"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Morgan695
imported>Feminist
(+)
Line 46: Line 46:
 
}}
 
}}
 
*{{reply to|Feminist}} Replaced with source deemed reliable in previous discussions [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Japan/Archive/April_2009#Is_allcinema.net_a_reliable_source%3F|here]] and [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_133#AllCinema.net|here]]. [[User:Morgan695|Morgan695]] ([[User talk:Morgan695|talk]]) 05:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 
*{{reply to|Feminist}} Replaced with source deemed reliable in previous discussions [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Japan/Archive/April_2009#Is_allcinema.net_a_reliable_source%3F|here]] and [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_133#AllCinema.net|here]]. [[User:Morgan695|Morgan695]] ([[User talk:Morgan695|talk]]) 05:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 +
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Alright. AGF for all Japanese-language sources. feminist [[User talk:Feminist|(talk)]] [[Surgical mask|wear a mask, you stupid bastards]] 05:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 
<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 05:22, 4 October 2020

Okama Report

  • ... that a Japanese LGBT rights group protested the 1989 manga series Okama Report for what it argued were its stereotypical and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people? Source: 1 2
    • ALT1:... that reprinted editions of the 1989 manga series Okama Report contain a postscript from an LGBT rights group noting that the series contains exaggerated and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people? Source: 1 2

Created by Morgan695 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg It's defo not long enuf once you cut out the uncited synopsis plus the parts that only refer to primary sources. Apart from the OCCUR controversy, I'm not sure if it actually meets notability guidelines, so it looks like more work needs to be done to demonstrate the subject's notability. Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Template:Reply to The article contains 1550 B of readable prose with the Synopsis section removed, meeting the length requirements for DYK. Morgan695 (talk) 16:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Template:U I have never came across a rule in which an uncited synopsis can't count toward the length. As for notability, do you want to nominate this for AfD to move this nomination along either way? SL93 (talk) 01:13, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  • POerhaps somebody more qualified would like to chime in. It just doesn't pass my smell test. Sorry I must have missed this. Kingoflettuce (talk) 14:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed. Morgan695 (talk) 15:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:Outdent Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.