Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Okama Report"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Feminist
(+)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 3)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from September 2020]]|}}<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=September 2020  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]])&nbsp;13:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|Okama Report}}
 
{{DYK header|Okama Report}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Okama Report|Okama Report}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Okama Report|Okama Report}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that a Japanese LGBT rights group protested the 1989 manga series '''''[[Okama Report]]''''' for what it argued were its stereotypical and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people? <small>Source: [https://www.mandarake.co.jp/dir/hondana/staff/2016/03/24/post-110.html 1] [https://news.infoseek.co.jp/article/cyzo_20160325_803491/?p=2 2]</small>
 
* ... that a Japanese LGBT rights group protested the 1989 manga series '''''[[Okama Report]]''''' for what it argued were its stereotypical and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people? <small>Source: [https://www.mandarake.co.jp/dir/hondana/staff/2016/03/24/post-110.html 1] [https://news.infoseek.co.jp/article/cyzo_20160325_803491/?p=2 2]</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that reprinted editions of the 1989 manga series '''''[[Okama Report]]''''' contain a postscript from an LGBT rights group noting that the series contains exaggerated and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people? <small>Source: [https://www.mandarake.co.jp/dir/hondana/staff/2016/03/24/post-110.html 1] [https://news.infoseek.co.jp/article/cyzo_20160325_803491/?p=2 2]</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that reprinted editions of the 1989 manga series '''''[[Okama Report]]''''' contain a postscript from an LGBT rights group noting that the series contains exaggerated and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people? <small>Source: [https://www.mandarake.co.jp/dir/hondana/staff/2016/03/24/post-110.html 1] [https://news.infoseek.co.jp/article/cyzo_20160325_803491/?p=2 2]</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Migration (Bonobo album)|Migration (Bonobo album)]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Migration (Bonobo album)|Migration (Bonobo album)]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Morgan695|Morgan695]] ([[User talk:Morgan695|talk]]). Self-nominated at 04:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Morgan695|Morgan695]] ([[User talk:Morgan695|talk]]). Self-nominated at 04:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Okama Report|Morgan695|subpage=Okama Report}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] It's defo not long enuf once you cut out the uncited synopsis plus the parts that only refer to primary sources. Apart from the OCCUR controversy, I'm not sure if it actually meets notability guidelines, so it looks like more work needs to be done to demonstrate the subject's notability. [[User:Kingoflettuce|Kingoflettuce]] ([[User talk:Kingoflettuce|talk]]) 09:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] It's defo not long enuf once you cut out the uncited synopsis plus the parts that only refer to primary sources. Apart from the OCCUR controversy, I'm not sure if it actually meets notability guidelines, so it looks like more work needs to be done to demonstrate the subject's notability. [[User:Kingoflettuce|Kingoflettuce]] ([[User talk:Kingoflettuce|talk]]) 09:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Line 43: Line 35:
 
|comments    = Prose length is not an issue, regardless of whether the Synopsis section is included or not. Sourcing is an issue.
 
|comments    = Prose length is not an issue, regardless of whether the Synopsis section is included or not. Sourcing is an issue.
 
|sign        = feminist [[User talk:Feminist|(talk)]] [[Surgical mask|wear a mask, you stupid bastards]] 03:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 
|sign        = feminist [[User talk:Feminist|(talk)]] [[Surgical mask|wear a mask, you stupid bastards]] 03:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
}}
+
}}</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly>
}}
 
 
*{{reply to|Feminist}} Replaced with source deemed reliable in previous discussions [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Japan/Archive/April_2009#Is_allcinema.net_a_reliable_source%3F|here]] and [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_133#AllCinema.net|here]]. [[User:Morgan695|Morgan695]] ([[User talk:Morgan695|talk]]) 05:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 
*{{reply to|Feminist}} Replaced with source deemed reliable in previous discussions [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Japan/Archive/April_2009#Is_allcinema.net_a_reliable_source%3F|here]] and [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_133#AllCinema.net|here]]. [[User:Morgan695|Morgan695]] ([[User talk:Morgan695|talk]]) 05:06, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Alright. AGF for all Japanese-language sources. feminist [[User talk:Feminist|(talk)]] [[Surgical mask|wear a mask, you stupid bastards]] 05:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Alright. AGF for all Japanese-language sources. feminist [[User talk:Feminist|(talk)]] [[Surgical mask|wear a mask, you stupid bastards]] 05:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 
<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 13:28, 4 October 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Okama Report

  • ... that a Japanese LGBT rights group protested the 1989 manga series Okama Report for what it argued were its stereotypical and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people? Source: 1 2
    • ALT1:... that reprinted editions of the 1989 manga series Okama Report contain a postscript from an LGBT rights group noting that the series contains exaggerated and inaccurate depictions of LGBT people? Source: 1 2

Created by Morgan695 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg It's defo not long enuf once you cut out the uncited synopsis plus the parts that only refer to primary sources. Apart from the OCCUR controversy, I'm not sure if it actually meets notability guidelines, so it looks like more work needs to be done to demonstrate the subject's notability. Kingoflettuce (talk) 09:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Template:Reply to The article contains 1550 B of readable prose with the Synopsis section removed, meeting the length requirements for DYK. Morgan695 (talk) 16:50, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Template:U I have never came across a rule in which an uncited synopsis can't count toward the length. As for notability, do you want to nominate this for AfD to move this nomination along either way? SL93 (talk) 01:13, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  • POerhaps somebody more qualified would like to chime in. It just doesn't pass my smell test. Sorry I must have missed this. Kingoflettuce (talk) 14:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed. Morgan695 (talk) 15:51, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:Outdent

Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.