Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/One Commercial Street"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Edwardx (QPQ review done) |
imported>Carabinieri (preliminary review) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | :* | + | :*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]]''One Commercial Street'' is marked as a stub and reads like one. It is also just barely over 1,500 characters and that includes a significant amount of text that's not really about this building. To be honest, I'm not even certain, the sources cited in the article are enough to clearly establish the topic's notability. |
+ | :*''Poor door'' has an unsourced paragraph.--[[User:Carabinieri|Carabinieri]] ([[User talk:Carabinieri|talk]]) 13:41, 29 September 2014 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 13:41, 29 September 2014
DYK toolbox |
---|
One Commercial Street, Poor door
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: One Commercial Street
- Poor door )
- ... that One Commercial Street, London will have a separate poor door for residents of the cheaper apartments?
- Reviewed: Cream of broccoli soup
- Comment: double nomination
Created by Edwardx (talk), Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 14:09, 30 August 2014 (UTC).
One Commercial Street is marked as a stub and reads like one. It is also just barely over 1,500 characters and that includes a significant amount of text that's not really about this building. To be honest, I'm not even certain, the sources cited in the article are enough to clearly establish the topic's notability.
- Poor door has an unsourced paragraph.--Carabinieri (talk) 13:41, 29 September 2014 (UTC)