Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/One Commercial Street"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Carabinieri
(preliminary review)
imported>BlueMoonset
(issues unaddressed after over two weeks; action needed if nomination is to remain open)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]]''One Commercial Street'' is marked as a stub and reads like one. It is also just barely over 1,500 characters and that includes a significant amount of text that's not really about this building. To be honest, I'm not even certain, the sources cited in the article are enough to clearly establish the topic's notability.
 
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]]''One Commercial Street'' is marked as a stub and reads like one. It is also just barely over 1,500 characters and that includes a significant amount of text that's not really about this building. To be honest, I'm not even certain, the sources cited in the article are enough to clearly establish the topic's notability.
 
:*''Poor door'' has an unsourced paragraph.--[[User:Carabinieri|Carabinieri]] ([[User talk:Carabinieri|talk]]) 13:41, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 
:*''Poor door'' has an unsourced paragraph.--[[User:Carabinieri|Carabinieri]] ([[User talk:Carabinieri|talk]]) 13:41, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
::*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]], it's been almost a week since I pinged you on this one. I've taken a look at the articles, and in addition to the issues already raised, there's the fact that 369 characters from the [[poor door]] article were copied into [[One Commercial Street]]. By DYK rules, this requires that One Commercial Street is a 5x expansion of that copied material, or 1845 prose characters. It's currently 1656 prose characters, and has a stub template; it also reads like a stub, with incomplete sentences, some tense issues (as the building has opened, using future tense to describe it isn't appropriate; it certainly isn't appropriate for the hook, since the source indicates that the elevator serving the building's poor door has already broken down), and some claims that definitely need sourcing, like the construction suspension and subsequent purchase. It may be that [[One Commercial Street]] will ultimately have to be dropped from the nomination, leaving [[poor door]], but the entire nomination will have to be closed if you fail to respond. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 03:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 03:17, 17 October 2014

One Commercial Street, Poor door

Created by Edwardx (talk), Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 14:09, 30 August 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svgOne Commercial Street is marked as a stub and reads like one. It is also just barely over 1,500 characters and that includes a significant amount of text that's not really about this building. To be honest, I'm not even certain, the sources cited in the article are enough to clearly establish the topic's notability.
  • Poor door has an unsourced paragraph.--Carabinieri (talk) 13:41, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg Edwardx, it's been almost a week since I pinged you on this one. I've taken a look at the articles, and in addition to the issues already raised, there's the fact that 369 characters from the poor door article were copied into One Commercial Street. By DYK rules, this requires that One Commercial Street is a 5x expansion of that copied material, or 1845 prose characters. It's currently 1656 prose characters, and has a stub template; it also reads like a stub, with incomplete sentences, some tense issues (as the building has opened, using future tense to describe it isn't appropriate; it certainly isn't appropriate for the hook, since the source indicates that the elevator serving the building's poor door has already broken down), and some claims that definitely need sourcing, like the construction suspension and subsequent purchase. It may be that One Commercial Street will ultimately have to be dropped from the nomination, leaving poor door, but the entire nomination will have to be closed if you fail to respond. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)