Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Oxbow Inlet"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Edwardx
(reply and ALT1)
imported>Jakec
(cmt)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
:::*Thanks. Now that you explain it in context, I do see your point. But I'm not convinced that the general public will pick up on that. I've had a go at an ALT1 to try to make it clearer:
 
:::*Thanks. Now that you explain it in context, I do see your point. But I'm not convinced that the general public will pick up on that. I've had a go at an ALT1 to try to make it clearer:
 
* '''ALT1''' ... although only {{convert|1.5|mi|km|adj=on}} long, '''[[Oxbow Inlet]]'''{{'s}} mineral concentrations were measured in 1966?
 
* '''ALT1''' ... although only {{convert|1.5|mi|km|adj=on}} long, '''[[Oxbow Inlet]]'''{{'s}} mineral concentrations were measured in 1966?
 
+
:*ALT1 is okay, but it might be better if it mentions what was measured (especially as some are strictly speaking elements, not minerals). --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 22:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 22:45, 28 November 2015

Oxbow Inlet

  • ... that the silica, iron, magnesium, calcium, and sulfate concentrations of the 1.5-mile (2.4 km) long Oxbow Inlet were measured in 1966?

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 16:11, 21 November 2015 (UTC).

  • Comment That hook is VERY dull. Is it not possible to find something even vaguely interesting? Edwardx (talk) 14:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
  • On the contrary, I find it rather remarkable that a anyone would bother to do any kind of study on such a small stream, and that the results would actually be floating around in the internet somewhere. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 15:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Now that you explain it in context, I do see your point. But I'm not convinced that the general public will pick up on that. I've had a go at an ALT1 to try to make it clearer:
  • ALT1 ... although only 1.5-mile (2.4 km) long, Oxbow Inlet's mineral concentrations were measured in 1966?
  • ALT1 is okay, but it might be better if it mentions what was measured (especially as some are strictly speaking elements, not minerals). --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 22:45, 28 November 2015 (UTC)