Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Pakistan–Samoa relations"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cbl62
(review)
imported>Cbl62
(Review)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
-->
 
-->
 
:* ''Comment'': Perhaps hold for November and [[:meta:Wikipedia Asian Month 2020 |Wikipedia Asian Month]]?
 
:* ''Comment'': Perhaps hold for November and [[:meta:Wikipedia Asian Month 2020 |Wikipedia Asian Month]]?
* Review underway. [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 02:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
+
* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Article is long enough, but it fails newness requirement, as it was created in Main Space on 9/17 but was not nominated until 10/3 (''e.g.'', 16 days later). See [[WP:DYK]]: "For DYK purposes, a 'new' article is no more than seven days old." Even if this were to be overlooked, the hooks are problematic. The lead hook is not remotely hooky. It is a completely bland fact that could be stated about any of 10,000 nation pairings: that Country A established relations with Country B in Year XXXX. Moreover, the alt 1 hook is not supported by the in-line citation provided. The hook asserts that the two countries successfully negotiated a TIE agreement, but the cited source does not say that such an agreement was signed.  It merely says that Samoa "invited an official request ... to start negotiations on the said agreement." [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 02:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 02:57, 3 October 2020

Pakistan–Samoa relations

Created by Mar4d (talk). Nominated by Vice regent (talk) at 00:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol delete vote.svg Article is long enough, but it fails newness requirement, as it was created in Main Space on 9/17 but was not nominated until 10/3 (e.g., 16 days later). See WP:DYK: "For DYK purposes, a 'new' article is no more than seven days old." Even if this were to be overlooked, the hooks are problematic. The lead hook is not remotely hooky. It is a completely bland fact that could be stated about any of 10,000 nation pairings: that Country A established relations with Country B in Year XXXX. Moreover, the alt 1 hook is not supported by the in-line citation provided. The hook asserts that the two countries successfully negotiated a TIE agreement, but the cited source does not say that such an agreement was signed. It merely says that Samoa "invited an official request ... to start negotiations on the said agreement." Cbl62 (talk) 02:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)