Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Pakistan–Samoa relations"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cbl62
(Review)
imported>Narutolovehinata5
(closing as unsuccessful)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|[[Category:Failed DYK nominations&nbsp;from October 2020]]|}}<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=October 2020  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''rejected''' by [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] ([[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|talk]])&nbsp;14:12, 3 October 2020 (UTC)<br />
 +
Ineligible due to late nomination, hook issues also exist. May be renominated for DYK if the article is expanded 5x or is brought to GA status.
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|Pakistan–Samoa relations}}
 
{{DYK header|Pakistan–Samoa relations}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Pakistan–Samoa relations|Pakistan–Samoa relations}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Pakistan–Samoa relations|Pakistan–Samoa relations}}
<!--
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
-->
 
 
* ... that '''[[Pakistan–Samoa relations|Pakistan established relations with Samoa]]''' in 1983?  <small>Source: [https://theworldnews.net/ws-news/samoa-and-pakistan-continue-to-strengthen-diplomatic-relations Samoa and Pakistan continue to strengthen diplomatic relations]</small>
 
* ... that '''[[Pakistan–Samoa relations|Pakistan established relations with Samoa]]''' in 1983?  <small>Source: [https://theworldnews.net/ws-news/samoa-and-pakistan-continue-to-strengthen-diplomatic-relations Samoa and Pakistan continue to strengthen diplomatic relations]</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that [[Pakistan]] has leveraged its '''[[Pakistan–Samoa relations|relationship with Samoa]]''' to negotiate a [[tax information exchange agreement]]?  <small>Source: [https://fp.brecorder.com/2017/04/20170414168302/ Positive response received from one tax haven so far]</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that [[Pakistan]] has leveraged its '''[[Pakistan–Samoa relations|relationship with Samoa]]''' to negotiate a [[tax information exchange agreement]]?  <small>Source: [https://fp.brecorder.com/2017/04/20170414168302/ Positive response received from one tax haven so far]</small>
Line 14: Line 12:
 
:* ''Comment'': I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mar4d&diff=980266594&oldid=979919287 intended to nominate this last week], but had some unexpected stuff come up in real life.
 
:* ''Comment'': I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mar4d&diff=980266594&oldid=979919287 intended to nominate this last week], but had some unexpected stuff come up in real life.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Mar4d|Mar4d]] ([[User talk:Mar4d|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Vice regent|Vice regent]] ([[User talk:Vice regent|talk]]) at 00:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Mar4d|Mar4d]] ([[User talk:Mar4d|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Vice regent|Vice regent]] ([[User talk:Vice regent|talk]]) at 00:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Pakistan–Samoa relations|Mar4d|subpage=Pakistan–Samoa relations}}
 
* {{DYKnom|Pakistan–Samoa relations|Vice regent}}
 
-->
 
 
:* ''Comment'': Perhaps hold for November and [[:meta:Wikipedia Asian Month 2020 |Wikipedia Asian Month]]?
 
:* ''Comment'': Perhaps hold for November and [[:meta:Wikipedia Asian Month 2020 |Wikipedia Asian Month]]?
* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Article is long enough, but it fails newness requirement, as it was created in Main Space on 9/17 but was not nominated until 10/3 (''e.g.'', 16 days later). See [[WP:DYK]]: "For DYK purposes, a 'new' article is no more than seven days old." Even if this were to be overlooked, the hooks are problematic. The lead hook is not remotely hooky. It is a completely bland fact that could be stated about any of 10,000 nation pairings: that Country A established relations with Country B in Year XXXX. Moreover, the alt 1 hook is not supported by the in-line citation provided. The hook asserts that the two countries successfully negotiated a TIE agreement, but the cited source does not say that such an agreement was signed.  It merely says that Samoa "invited an official request ... to start negotiations on the said agreement." [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 02:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
+
* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Article is long enough, but it fails newness requirement, as it was created in Main Space on 9/17 but was not nominated until 10/3 (''e.g.'', 16 days later). See [[WP:DYK]]: "For DYK purposes, a 'new' article is no more than seven days old." Even if this were to be overlooked, the hooks are problematic. The lead hook is not remotely hooky. It is a completely bland fact that could be stated about any of 10,000 nation pairings: that Country A established relations with Country B in Year XXXX. Moreover, the alt 1 hook is not supported by the in-line citation provided. The hook asserts that the two countries successfully negotiated a TIE agreement, but the cited source does not say that such an agreement was signed.  It merely says that Samoa "invited an official request ... to start negotiations on the said agreement." [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 02:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 14:12, 3 October 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 14:12, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Ineligible due to late nomination, hook issues also exist. May be renominated for DYK if the article is expanded 5x or is brought to GA status.

Pakistan–Samoa relations

Created by Mar4d (talk). Nominated by Vice regent (talk) at 00:16, 3 October 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol delete vote.svg Article is long enough, but it fails newness requirement, as it was created in Main Space on 9/17 but was not nominated until 10/3 (e.g., 16 days later). See WP:DYK: "For DYK purposes, a 'new' article is no more than seven days old." Even if this were to be overlooked, the hooks are problematic. The lead hook is not remotely hooky. It is a completely bland fact that could be stated about any of 10,000 nation pairings: that Country A established relations with Country B in Year XXXX. Moreover, the alt 1 hook is not supported by the in-line citation provided. The hook asserts that the two countries successfully negotiated a TIE agreement, but the cited source does not say that such an agreement was signed. It merely says that Samoa "invited an official request ... to start negotiations on the said agreement." Cbl62 (talk) 02:56, 3 October 2020 (UTC)