Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Pankaj Chandak"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset (reviewer needed to complete review) |
imported>BlueMoonset (updating my recent post since a new reviewer will be needed) |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
{{reply to|Janweh64}} Thank you for reviewing. I appreciate your comments and will work on them as I feel this is a good hook and page. Time is a factor but will make effort to improve this section.[[User:Whispyhistory|Whispyhistory]] ([[User talk:Whispyhistory|talk]]) 07:09, 4 July 2017 (UTC) | {{reply to|Janweh64}} Thank you for reviewing. I appreciate your comments and will work on them as I feel this is a good hook and page. Time is a factor but will make effort to improve this section.[[User:Whispyhistory|Whispyhistory]] ([[User talk:Whispyhistory|talk]]) 07:09, 4 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
:{{ping|Janweh64}} The article creator ({{ping|Whispyhistory}}) has now addressed the concerns you flagged, and we believe it is '''good to go for a second review attempt'''. The high Earwig Copyvio return has been reduced to 39% - but it was always the use of numerous unchangeable award names, hospital names and technical terms which caused most of that to be flagged. I don't think it can be reduced any further. Sorry for the delay in responding; I've been encouraging and guiding a new editor through this process - and I'm sure we've gained a really great new contributor to Wikipedia as a result. Regards from the UK [[User:Nick Moyes|Nick Moyes]] ([[User talk:Nick Moyes|talk]]) 11:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC) | :{{ping|Janweh64}} The article creator ({{ping|Whispyhistory}}) has now addressed the concerns you flagged, and we believe it is '''good to go for a second review attempt'''. The high Earwig Copyvio return has been reduced to 39% - but it was always the use of numerous unchangeable award names, hospital names and technical terms which caused most of that to be flagged. I don't think it can be reduced any further. Sorry for the delay in responding; I've been encouraging and guiding a new editor through this process - and I'm sure we've gained a really great new contributor to Wikipedia as a result. Regards from the UK [[User:Nick Moyes|Nick Moyes]] ([[User talk:Nick Moyes|talk]]) 11:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
| − | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] | + | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] New reviewer needed to complete this review. Based on the earlier review, checking for copyvio and close paraphrasing should be included, along with standard sourcing and neutrality checks. Many thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 16:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC) (updated 05:00, 25 July 2017 (UTC)) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 05:00, 25 July 2017
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pankaj Chandak
- ... that surgeon Pankaj Chandak was the first person ever to use 3D printing to help plan a kidney transplant into a child? Source: His multidisciplinary work on integrating 3D printing into complex paediatric transplantation as a world first was awarded The Royal Society of Medicine Norman Tanner Medal 2016
- ALT1:... that surgeon Pankaj Chandak and his colleagues are believed to be the first ever medical team to have been employed as actors in a television drama, namely The Crown? Source: Big-budget royal series The Crown saw a team of qualified surgeons used in a scene instead of actors...It is thought to be the first time real doctors have been used in a television production to add plausibility.
- Reviewed: Mandatory eight count
Created by Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Nick Moyes (talk) at 01:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC).
- Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- It is new enough; the article was created on May 22 and nominated exactly 7 days later on May 29. At 2837 characters, it is long enough.
- The education section has serious issues. It is either unsourced or very weakly sourced. The only source in the section contains little biographical info. [1]
- This sentence is unsourced: "Chandak has been involved in communicating science to broader audiences. This has included presenting live demonstrations for The BBC, Channel 5, British Science Festival2016 and London Open House." And there may be more sourcing issues.
- Fails Earwig's Copyvio Detector —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 04:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Template:Reply to Thank you for reviewing. I appreciate your comments and will work on them as I feel this is a good hook and page. Time is a factor but will make effort to improve this section.Whispyhistory (talk) 07:09, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Ping The article creator (Template:Ping) has now addressed the concerns you flagged, and we believe it is good to go for a second review attempt. The high Earwig Copyvio return has been reduced to 39% - but it was always the use of numerous unchangeable award names, hospital names and technical terms which caused most of that to be flagged. I don't think it can be reduced any further. Sorry for the delay in responding; I've been encouraging and guiding a new editor through this process - and I'm sure we've gained a really great new contributor to Wikipedia as a result. Regards from the UK Nick Moyes (talk) 11:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
New reviewer needed to complete this review. Based on the earlier review, checking for copyvio and close paraphrasing should be included, along with standard sourcing and neutrality checks. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC) (updated 05:00, 25 July 2017 (UTC))