Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Pankaj Chandak"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(reviewer needed to complete review)
imported>BlueMoonset
(updating my recent post since a new reviewer will be needed)
Line 45: Line 45:
 
{{reply to|Janweh64}} Thank you for reviewing. I appreciate your comments and will work on them as I feel this is a good hook and page. Time is a factor but will make effort to improve this section.[[User:Whispyhistory|Whispyhistory]] ([[User talk:Whispyhistory|talk]]) 07:09, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 
{{reply to|Janweh64}} Thank you for reviewing. I appreciate your comments and will work on them as I feel this is a good hook and page. Time is a factor but will make effort to improve this section.[[User:Whispyhistory|Whispyhistory]] ([[User talk:Whispyhistory|talk]]) 07:09, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 
:{{ping|Janweh64}} The article creator ({{ping|Whispyhistory}}) has now addressed the concerns you flagged, and we believe it is '''good to go for a second review attempt'''. The high Earwig Copyvio return has been reduced to 39% - but it was always the use of numerous unchangeable award names, hospital names and technical terms which caused most of that to be flagged. I don't think it can be reduced any further. Sorry for the delay in responding; I've been encouraging and guiding a new editor through this process - and I'm sure we've gained a really great new contributor to Wikipedia as a result. Regards from the UK [[User:Nick Moyes|Nick Moyes]] ([[User talk:Nick Moyes|talk]]) 11:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 
:{{ping|Janweh64}} The article creator ({{ping|Whispyhistory}}) has now addressed the concerns you flagged, and we believe it is '''good to go for a second review attempt'''. The high Earwig Copyvio return has been reduced to 39% - but it was always the use of numerous unchangeable award names, hospital names and technical terms which caused most of that to be flagged. I don't think it can be reduced any further. Sorry for the delay in responding; I've been encouraging and guiding a new editor through this process - and I'm sure we've gained a really great new contributor to Wikipedia as a result. Regards from the UK [[User:Nick Moyes|Nick Moyes]] ([[User talk:Nick Moyes|talk]]) 11:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Reviewer needed to complete this review. Many thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 16:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
+
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] New reviewer needed to complete this review. Based on the earlier review, checking for copyvio and close paraphrasing should be included, along with standard sourcing and neutrality checks. Many thanks. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 16:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC) (updated 05:00, 25 July 2017 (UTC))
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 05:00, 25 July 2017

Pankaj Chandak

Created by Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Nick Moyes (talk) at 01:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
  • It is new enough; the article was created on May 22 and nominated exactly 7 days later on May 29. At 2837 characters, it is long enough.
  • The education section has serious issues. It is either unsourced or very weakly sourced. The only source in the section contains little biographical info. [1]
  • This sentence is unsourced: "Chandak has been involved in communicating science to broader audiences. This has included presenting live demonstrations for The BBCChannel 5British Science Festival2016 and London Open House." And there may be more sourcing issues.
  • Fails Earwig's Copyvio Detector —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 04:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Template:Reply to Thank you for reviewing. I appreciate your comments and will work on them as I feel this is a good hook and page. Time is a factor but will make effort to improve this section.Whispyhistory (talk) 07:09, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Template:Ping The article creator (Template:Ping) has now addressed the concerns you flagged, and we believe it is good to go for a second review attempt. The high Earwig Copyvio return has been reduced to 39% - but it was always the use of numerous unchangeable award names, hospital names and technical terms which caused most of that to be flagged. I don't think it can be reduced any further. Sorry for the delay in responding; I've been encouraging and guiding a new editor through this process - and I'm sure we've gained a really great new contributor to Wikipedia as a result. Regards from the UK Nick Moyes (talk) 11:50, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed to complete this review. Based on the earlier review, checking for copyvio and close paraphrasing should be included, along with standard sourcing and neutrality checks. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC) (updated 05:00, 25 July 2017 (UTC))