Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Panulirus penicillatus"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth |
imported>Richwales (good to go) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* < | + | :* Article is brand new, long enough, neutral, uses inline citations to sources, and appears to be free of copyvio problems. The hook is OK. QPQ review checks out. No image offered for DYK; there are a couple of Commons images in the article, but I doubt they would look very good if reduced. [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] '''Good to go.''' — [[User:Richwales|<u>Rich</u>]][[User talk:Richwales|wales]] <small>''(no relation to Jimbo)''</small> 04:08, 25 July 2015 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 04:09, 25 July 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Panulirus penicillatus
- ... that although the spiny lobster Panulirus penicillatus is heavily exploited for food throughout its range, its total population seems relatively unaffected?
- Reviewed: Paramahamsa Upanishad
Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:30, 24 July 2015 (UTC).
- Article is brand new, long enough, neutral, uses inline citations to sources, and appears to be free of copyvio problems. The hook is OK. QPQ review checks out. No image offered for DYK; there are a couple of Commons images in the article, but I doubt they would look very good if reduced.
Good to go. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 04:08, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- Article is brand new, long enough, neutral, uses inline citations to sources, and appears to be free of copyvio problems. The hook is OK. QPQ review checks out. No image offered for DYK; there are a couple of Commons images in the article, but I doubt they would look very good if reduced.