Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Paul F. Heard"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>FourViolas (pass but propose a hook copyedit) |
imported>Yoninah (r) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | * ... that producer '''[[Paul F. Heard]]''' believed that techniques used in government [[propaganda film]]s could be used in [[List of religious films|religious films]] to bring about "spiritual realizations"? | + | * <s>... that producer '''[[Paul F. Heard]]''' believed that techniques used in government [[propaganda film]]s could be used in [[List of religious films|religious films]] to bring about "spiritual realizations"? </s> <small>Source: "He believed 'similar techniques' could be used to address contemporary problems requiring 'spiritual realizations'". ([https://books.google.co.il/books?id=YZ9QI-t7TwUC&pg=PA114&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false ''Reforming Hollywood''])</small> |
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Tubby Schmalz]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Tubby Schmalz]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]). Self-nominated at 20:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]). Self-nominated at 20:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC).</small> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
::Hook is under the length limit and interesting to a general public. It's reasonably neutral, although it comes off as a little conspiratorial out of context. I hate to be perfectionist, but is there a chance you'd like to change the second "used in" to "applied to", the way it is in the article? [[User:FourViolas|FourViolas]] ([[User talk:FourViolas|talk]]) 01:33, 22 May 2020 (UTC) | ::Hook is under the length limit and interesting to a general public. It's reasonably neutral, although it comes off as a little conspiratorial out of context. I hate to be perfectionist, but is there a chance you'd like to change the second "used in" to "applied to", the way it is in the article? [[User:FourViolas|FourViolas]] ([[User talk:FourViolas|talk]]) 01:33, 22 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :::*Thanks for the review. Sure, your suggestion is fine, but "applying a technique" sounds a little strange. How about "employing a technique"? | |
| + | :::*'''ALT1''': ... that producer '''[[Paul F. Heard]]''' believed that techniques used in government [[propaganda film]]s could be employed in [[List of religious films|religious films]] to bring about "spiritual realizations"? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 14:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 14:21, 22 May 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Paul F. Heard
... that producer Paul F. Heard believed that techniques used in government propaganda films could be used in religious films to bring about "spiritual realizations"?Source: "He believed 'similar techniques' could be used to address contemporary problems requiring 'spiritual realizations'". (Reforming Hollywood)
Created by Yoninah (talk). Self-nominated at 20:28, 5 May 2020 (UTC).
New enough, long enough. Paraphrasing is fine. Exceptionally well-researched and fully-cited; I was going to make the minor comment I had to take this page on AGF as a RS for the PFC-to-BFC merger under WP:PUBLISHED, but then the clipping at the end of the sentence confirmed it. Neutral and clear throughout.
- Hook is under the length limit and interesting to a general public. It's reasonably neutral, although it comes off as a little conspiratorial out of context. I hate to be perfectionist, but is there a chance you'd like to change the second "used in" to "applied to", the way it is in the article? FourViolas (talk) 01:33, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. Sure, your suggestion is fine, but "applying a technique" sounds a little strange. How about "employing a technique"?
- ALT1: ... that producer Paul F. Heard believed that techniques used in government propaganda films could be employed in religious films to bring about "spiritual realizations"? Yoninah (talk) 14:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hook is under the length limit and interesting to a general public. It's reasonably neutral, although it comes off as a little conspiratorial out of context. I hate to be perfectionist, but is there a chance you'd like to change the second "used in" to "applied to", the way it is in the article? FourViolas (talk) 01:33, 22 May 2020 (UTC)