Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Paul W. Tibbets IV"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Crisco 1492 (re) |
imported>ViperSnake151 |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] AGF here because the Air Force's website ''still'' won't let me through (come on now!). Article is new enough and long enough. Referencing is pretty good, image is free, no close paraphrasing found. Hook fact is in the article and cited. Article is good to go. — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 12:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC) <!-- By replacing this line, write first comment here. --> | :*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] AGF here because the Air Force's website ''still'' won't let me through (come on now!). Article is new enough and long enough. Referencing is pretty good, image is free, no close paraphrasing found. Hook fact is in the article and cited. Article is good to go. — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 12:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC) <!-- By replacing this line, write first comment here. --> | ||
− | + | ::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I can get through to the site and confirm the details cited by those references. By our powers combined, we are good to go. <span style="border:1px solid #f57900;padding:1px;"><font style="color:#8f5902">[[User:ViperSnake151|ViperSnake151]]</font> [[User_talk:ViperSnake151|<font style="color:#fff;background:#fcaf3e;"> Talk </font>]] </span> 23:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC) | |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 23:44, 9 June 2014
DYK toolbox |
---|
Paul W. Tibbets IV
- ... that Paul W. Tibbets IV (pictured) is one of the few pilots qualified to fly the B-1, B-2 and the B-52?
Created by Hawkeye7 (talk). Self nominated at 03:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC).
AGF here because the Air Force's website still won't let me through (come on now!). Article is new enough and long enough. Referencing is pretty good, image is free, no close paraphrasing found. Hook fact is in the article and cited. Article is good to go. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:24, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
I can get through to the site and confirm the details cited by those references. By our powers combined, we are good to go. ViperSnake151 Talk 23:44, 9 June 2014 (UTC)