Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Pendleton Dudley"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>DarjeelingTea (thx) |
imported>Borsoka (OK) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | * ... that '''[[Pendleton Dudley]]''' refused to talk about the work he did to launch [[Woodrow Wilson]]'s political career, because revelation of the details would be "damaging"? | + | * <s>... that '''[[Pendleton Dudley]]''' refused to talk about the work he did to launch [[Woodrow Wilson]]'s political career, because revelation of the details would be "damaging"?</s> |
| − | **'''ALT-1:''' ... that '''[[Pendleton Dudley]]''' refused to talk about the work he did to launch [[Woodrow Wilson]]'s political career, because revelation of the details would be "damaging to our profession ([[public relations]])"? | + | **'''ALT-1:''' <s>... that '''[[Pendleton Dudley]]''' refused to talk about the work he did to launch [[Woodrow Wilson]]'s political career, because revelation of the details would be "damaging to our profession ([[public relations]])"?</s> |
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Trachelyopterus insignis]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Trachelyopterus insignis]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:DarjeelingTea|DarjeelingTea]] ([[User talk:DarjeelingTea|talk]]). Self-nominated at 01:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:DarjeelingTea|DarjeelingTea]] ([[User talk:DarjeelingTea|talk]]). Self-nominated at 01:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC).</small> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]. The article is new (created on 26 March) and it is also long enough. It cites sources with inline citations and is free of close paraphrasing issues. My concern is that the referred source does not fully substantiates the hook fact. According to the cited source (and the article), Dudley specified that the revelation of the details would be "damaging to our profession" (that is, to PR). However, the hook could easily be interpreted that the revelation would be damaging to Wilson's fame. [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 14:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC) | + | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]. The article is new (created on 26 March) and it is also long enough. It cites sources with inline citations and is free of close paraphrasing issues. <s>My concern is that the referred source does not fully substantiates the hook fact. According to the cited source (and the article), Dudley specified that the revelation of the details would be "damaging to our profession" (that is, to PR). However, the hook could easily be interpreted that the revelation would be damaging to Wilson's fame.</s>[[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 14:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC) |
::* I made the same inference! [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 23:04, 26 March 2017 (UTC) | ::* I made the same inference! [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 23:04, 26 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
::[[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] - thanks for the catch, I meant to include that, not sure how I omitted it. Have proposed an Alt-1. [[User:DarjeelingTea|DarjeelingTea]] ([[User talk:DarjeelingTea|talk]]) 20:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC) | ::[[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] - thanks for the catch, I meant to include that, not sure how I omitted it. Have proposed an Alt-1. [[User:DarjeelingTea|DarjeelingTea]] ([[User talk:DarjeelingTea|talk]]) 20:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
***'''ALT-2:''' ... that '''[[Pendleton Dudley]]''' refused to talk about the work he did to launch [[Woodrow Wilson]]'s political career? | ***'''ALT-2:''' ... that '''[[Pendleton Dudley]]''' refused to talk about the work he did to launch [[Woodrow Wilson]]'s political career? | ||
:::Looks good to me, [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]]! [[User:DarjeelingTea|DarjeelingTea]] ([[User talk:DarjeelingTea|talk]]) 20:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC) | :::Looks good to me, [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]]! [[User:DarjeelingTea|DarjeelingTea]] ([[User talk:DarjeelingTea|talk]]) 20:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
| + | :[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]. ALT-2 is good to go. [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 00:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | <!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 00:47, 10 April 2017
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pendleton Dudley
... that Pendleton Dudley refused to talk about the work he did to launch Woodrow Wilson's political career, because revelation of the details would be "damaging"?- ALT-1:
... that Pendleton Dudley refused to talk about the work he did to launch Woodrow Wilson's political career, because revelation of the details would be "damaging to our profession (public relations)"?
- ALT-1:
Created by DarjeelingTea (talk). Self-nominated at 01:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC).
. The article is new (created on 26 March) and it is also long enough. It cites sources with inline citations and is free of close paraphrasing issues. My concern is that the referred source does not fully substantiates the hook fact. According to the cited source (and the article), Dudley specified that the revelation of the details would be "damaging to our profession" (that is, to PR). However, the hook could easily be interpreted that the revelation would be damaging to Wilson's fame.Borsoka (talk) 14:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Borsoka - thanks for the catch, I meant to include that, not sure how I omitted it. Have proposed an Alt-1. DarjeelingTea (talk) 20:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- ALT-2: ... that Pendleton Dudley refused to talk about the work he did to launch Woodrow Wilson's political career?
- Looks good to me, Borsoka! DarjeelingTea (talk) 20:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
. ALT-2 is good to go. Borsoka (talk) 00:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)