Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Pendleton Dudley"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Borsoka (OK) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 3) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from March 2017]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Pendleton Dudley==== | ====Pendleton Dudley==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Pendleton Dudley|Pendleton Dudley}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Pendleton Dudley|Pendleton Dudley}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* <s>... that '''[[Pendleton Dudley]]''' refused to talk about the work he did to launch [[Woodrow Wilson]]'s political career, because revelation of the details would be "damaging"?</s> | * <s>... that '''[[Pendleton Dudley]]''' refused to talk about the work he did to launch [[Woodrow Wilson]]'s political career, because revelation of the details would be "damaging"?</s> | ||
**'''ALT-1:''' <s>... that '''[[Pendleton Dudley]]''' refused to talk about the work he did to launch [[Woodrow Wilson]]'s political career, because revelation of the details would be "damaging to our profession ([[public relations]])"?</s> | **'''ALT-1:''' <s>... that '''[[Pendleton Dudley]]''' refused to talk about the work he did to launch [[Woodrow Wilson]]'s political career, because revelation of the details would be "damaging to our profession ([[public relations]])"?</s> | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Trachelyopterus insignis]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Trachelyopterus insignis]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:DarjeelingTea|DarjeelingTea]] ([[User talk:DarjeelingTea|talk]]). Self-nominated at 01:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:DarjeelingTea|DarjeelingTea]] ([[User talk:DarjeelingTea|talk]]). Self-nominated at 01:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]. The article is new (created on 26 March) and it is also long enough. It cites sources with inline citations and is free of close paraphrasing issues. <s>My concern is that the referred source does not fully substantiates the hook fact. According to the cited source (and the article), Dudley specified that the revelation of the details would be "damaging to our profession" (that is, to PR). However, the hook could easily be interpreted that the revelation would be damaging to Wilson's fame.</s>[[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 14:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]. The article is new (created on 26 March) and it is also long enough. It cites sources with inline citations and is free of close paraphrasing issues. <s>My concern is that the referred source does not fully substantiates the hook fact. According to the cited source (and the article), Dudley specified that the revelation of the details would be "damaging to our profession" (that is, to PR). However, the hook could easily be interpreted that the revelation would be damaging to Wilson's fame.</s>[[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 14:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
::* I made the same inference! [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 23:04, 26 March 2017 (UTC) | ::* I made the same inference! [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 23:04, 26 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
::[[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] - thanks for the catch, I meant to include that, not sure how I omitted it. Have proposed an Alt-1. [[User:DarjeelingTea|DarjeelingTea]] ([[User talk:DarjeelingTea|talk]]) 20:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC) | ::[[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] - thanks for the catch, I meant to include that, not sure how I omitted it. Have proposed an Alt-1. [[User:DarjeelingTea|DarjeelingTea]] ([[User talk:DarjeelingTea|talk]]) 20:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ||
::::My concern is that ALT1 is too long. What about the following ALT? [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 03:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC) | ::::My concern is that ALT1 is too long. What about the following ALT? [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 03:16, 9 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
***'''ALT-2:''' ... that '''[[Pendleton Dudley]]''' refused to talk about the work he did to launch [[Woodrow Wilson]]'s political career? | ***'''ALT-2:''' ... that '''[[Pendleton Dudley]]''' refused to talk about the work he did to launch [[Woodrow Wilson]]'s political career? | ||
:::Looks good to me, [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]]! [[User:DarjeelingTea|DarjeelingTea]] ([[User talk:DarjeelingTea|talk]]) 20:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC) | :::Looks good to me, [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]]! [[User:DarjeelingTea|DarjeelingTea]] ([[User talk:DarjeelingTea|talk]]) 20:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
| − | :[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]. ALT-2 is good to go. [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 00:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC) | + | :[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]. ALT-2 is good to go. [[User:Borsoka|Borsoka]] ([[User talk:Borsoka|talk]]) 00:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | <!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 06:06, 11 April 2017
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pendleton Dudley
... that Pendleton Dudley refused to talk about the work he did to launch Woodrow Wilson's political career, because revelation of the details would be "damaging"?- ALT-1:
... that Pendleton Dudley refused to talk about the work he did to launch Woodrow Wilson's political career, because revelation of the details would be "damaging to our profession (public relations)"?
- ALT-1:
Created by DarjeelingTea (talk). Self-nominated at 01:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC).
. The article is new (created on 26 March) and it is also long enough. It cites sources with inline citations and is free of close paraphrasing issues. My concern is that the referred source does not fully substantiates the hook fact. According to the cited source (and the article), Dudley specified that the revelation of the details would be "damaging to our profession" (that is, to PR). However, the hook could easily be interpreted that the revelation would be damaging to Wilson's fame.Borsoka (talk) 14:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Borsoka - thanks for the catch, I meant to include that, not sure how I omitted it. Have proposed an Alt-1. DarjeelingTea (talk) 20:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- ALT-2: ... that Pendleton Dudley refused to talk about the work he did to launch Woodrow Wilson's political career?
- Looks good to me, Borsoka! DarjeelingTea (talk) 20:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
. ALT-2 is good to go. Borsoka (talk) 00:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)