Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Perijá tapaculo"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Thine Antique Pen
(small note, thanks. !nosign!)
imported>Allen3
(to prep1)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from August 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=August 2015  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by ''[[User: Allen3|Allen3]]''&nbsp;<sup>[[User talk:Allen3|talk]]</sup> 21:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Perijá tapaculo====
 
====Perijá tapaculo====
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img">
 
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img">
 
{{main page image|image=Scytalopus perijanus (16786170472).jpg|caption=Perijá tapaculo}}
 
{{main page image|image=Scytalopus perijanus (16786170472).jpg|caption=Perijá tapaculo}}
</div><!--
+
</div>
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that specimens of the '''[[Perijá tapaculo]]''' ''(pictured)'' were classified as being from four different other bird species before being identified as a separate species?
 
* ... that specimens of the '''[[Perijá tapaculo]]''' ''(pictured)'' were classified as being from four different other bird species before being identified as a separate species?
  
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Nayanars|Pusalar]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Nayanars|Pusalar]]
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Thine Antique Pen|Thine Antique Pen]] ([[User talk:Thine Antique Pen|talk]]). Self-nominated at 16:57, 4 August 2015 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Thine Antique Pen|Thine Antique Pen]] ([[User talk:Thine Antique Pen|talk]]). Self-nominated at 16:57, 4 August 2015 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Perijá tapaculo|Thine Antique Pen|subpage=Perijá tapaculo}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is indeed a GA, and is cited. Relies heavily on a single source, but this is unavoidable when dealing with a newly discovered species, and there are some independent references. [[User:Smurrayinchester|Smurrayinchester]] 13:59, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is indeed a GA, and is cited. Relies heavily on a single source, but this is unavoidable when dealing with a newly discovered species, and there are some independent references. [[User:Smurrayinchester|Smurrayinchester]] 13:59, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 
::*<small>Just noting that it became a GA after the time of nomination and the article was 5x expanded. Thanks for reviewing! [[User:Thine Antique Pen|Thine Antique Pen]] ([[User talk:Thine Antique Pen|talk]]) 15:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC)</small>
 
::*<small>Just noting that it became a GA after the time of nomination and the article was 5x expanded. Thanks for reviewing! [[User:Thine Antique Pen|Thine Antique Pen]] ([[User talk:Thine Antique Pen|talk]]) 15:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC)</small>
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
{{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 21:32, 30 August 2015

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 21:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Perijá tapaculo

Perijá tapaculo
Perijá tapaculo
  • ... that specimens of the Perijá tapaculo (pictured) were classified as being from four different other bird species before being identified as a separate species?

5x expanded by Thine Antique Pen (talk). Self-nominated at 16:57, 4 August 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Article is indeed a GA, and is cited. Relies heavily on a single source, but this is unavoidable when dealing with a newly discovered species, and there are some independent references. Smurrayinchester 13:59, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Just noting that it became a GA after the time of nomination and the article was 5x expanded. Thanks for reviewing! Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC)