Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Peter Force"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Gwillhickers
imported>Gwillhickers
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that the library of '''[[Peter Force]]''', ''(pictured)'' is considered the most important collection of military manuscripts and maps from the [[American Revolution]]? — <small>[https://archive.org/details/lifelaborsofpete00spof/page/n5/mode/2up Spofford, 1898, p. 4-5] &nbsp;[https://archive.org/details/newyorktypograph00stev/page/96/mode/2up Stevens, 1913, p. 97]</small>
+
* ... that the library of '''[[Peter Force]]''', ''(pictured)'' is considered the most important collection of military manuscripts and maps from the [[American Revolution]]? — <small>[https://archive.org/details/lifelaborsofpete00spof/page/n5/mode/2up Spofford, 1898, p. 4-5] &nbsp;[https://archive.org/details/newyorktypograph00stev/page/96/mode/2up Stevens, 1913, p. 97], &nbsp;[https://www.loc.gov/rr/mss/coll/084.html Library of Congress, Reading Room Essay]</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Wei Zhongquan]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Wei Zhongquan]]
 
:* ''Comment'': Text and source supporting hook can be found in the ''Historian – Published works'' section, 3rd paragraph.
 
:* ''Comment'': Text and source supporting hook can be found in the ''Historian – Published works'' section, 3rd paragraph.

Revision as of 02:03, 5 March 2020

Peter Force

Peter Force in 1815
Peter Force in 1815

5x expanded by Gwillhickers (talk). Self-nominated at 21:55, 3 March 2020 (UTC).

  • Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
  • Thanks for your review. There is a question mark after the QPQ, which I've completed. (Template:Did you know nominations/Wei Zhongquan) I cited the term "During his life time", while also adding terms more in line with that source. I also expanded the page range on the Spofford citation and have added Stevens, 1913, p.97 to better cover the hook and supporting statement. I've added and tweaked some citations so the cite numbers have shifted. If there are other sourcing issues could you be specific? I'm not sure what you mean by "fleshed out." -- Gwillhickers (talk) 00:23, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping By flesh out, I mean that a reference should not be a WP:Bare URL. Also, the ref at the end of the paragraph starting with "In 1867" is still malformatted. Ergo Sum 13:22, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  •  Done Fixed mal-formed ref and fleshed out citation in question. Some of the citations were present before I began expanding the article. Thanks for looking out. -- Gwillhickers (talk) 20:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  • Ref 24 is still a bare URL. I am only making a big deal out of this because it is one of the refs that directly supports the hook. Ergo Sum 20:22, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
  • No problems. I caught that and was working on it, probably at the same time of your reply here. (Fixed) -- Gwillhickers (talk) 20:41, 4 March 2020

Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go now. Ergo Sum 21:17, 4 March 2020 (UTC)