Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Peter Schmidt (economist)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Malinaccier
(Reply with in line text from the citation)
imported>Yoninah
(r)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
:::::*{{ping|Malinaccier}} I'm looking for accuracy. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 
:::::*{{ping|Malinaccier}} I'm looking for accuracy. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:46, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 
::::::*{{ping|Yoninah}} The article I cited was by [[Takeshi Amemiya]], a top Stanford econometrician.  The article cited is published in an academic journal: [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407608002042]. In line text: "I will give brief summaries of ten path-breaking papers which I believe have made great impact on the econometrics profession.... Since the publication of Aigner, Lovell, and Schmidt (Journal of Econometrics, 6-1, 1977, 21-37), this important topic has become one of the favorite topics of the Journal of Econometrics." '''[[User:Malinaccier|<span style="color:#003153">Malinaccier</span>]] ([[User talk:Malinaccier|<span style="color:#003153">talk</span>]])''' 22:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 
::::::*{{ping|Yoninah}} The article I cited was by [[Takeshi Amemiya]], a top Stanford econometrician.  The article cited is published in an academic journal: [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407608002042]. In line text: "I will give brief summaries of ten path-breaking papers which I believe have made great impact on the econometrics profession.... Since the publication of Aigner, Lovell, and Schmidt (Journal of Econometrics, 6-1, 1977, 21-37), this important topic has become one of the favorite topics of the Journal of Econometrics." '''[[User:Malinaccier|<span style="color:#003153">Malinaccier</span>]] ([[User talk:Malinaccier|<span style="color:#003153">talk</span>]])''' 22:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 +
:::::::*{{ping|Malinaccier}} Great, thanks! So which fact would you like to put in the hook, that it's "one of the most influential ''[[Journal of Econometrics]]'' papers of all time" or "one of the most cited ''[[Journal of Econometrics]]'' papers of all time"? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:56, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 22:56, 12 July 2017

Peter Schmidt (economist)

Created by Malinaccier (talk). Self-nominated at 01:23, 7 July 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Template:Ping hook is way too long (can't be over 200 characters), but the article meets all other requirements, new enough, long enough, within policy. YE Pacific Hurricane 15:41, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, and was wondering how it is the "most influential"? What exactly does the offline source say? I wonder if it's also the "most cited". Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:26, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping Hi, the source describes Schmidt's work as "path-breaking." The source doesn't make any claims about his work being most cited, though looking at a new source the paper is one of the most cited of all time. Are you looking to add more interesting detail to the hook? Malinaccier (talk) 22:41, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping The article I cited was by Takeshi Amemiya, a top Stanford econometrician. The article cited is published in an academic journal: [1]. In line text: "I will give brief summaries of ten path-breaking papers which I believe have made great impact on the econometrics profession.... Since the publication of Aigner, Lovell, and Schmidt (Journal of Econometrics, 6-1, 1977, 21-37), this important topic has become one of the favorite topics of the Journal of Econometrics." Malinaccier (talk) 22:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC)