Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Peterborough sex abuse case"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Georgejdorner m (Thanks.) |
imported>Panyd (Passed) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from April 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 21:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Peterborough sex abuse case==== | ====Peterborough sex abuse case==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Peterborough sex abuse case|Peterborough sex abuse case}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Peterborough sex abuse case|Peterborough sex abuse case}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that in reaction to child sexual exploitation cases [[Rochdale sex trafficking gang|in Rochdale]] and [[Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal|in Rotherham]], police investigated and prosecuted a similar case [[Peterborough sex abuse case|'''in Peterborough''']]? | * ... that in reaction to child sexual exploitation cases [[Rochdale sex trafficking gang|in Rochdale]] and [[Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal|in Rotherham]], police investigated and prosecuted a similar case [[Peterborough sex abuse case|'''in Peterborough''']]? | ||
| Line 16: | Line 11: | ||
:* ''Comment'': Not a nice topic, but one which must be spoken of fairly | :* ''Comment'': Not a nice topic, but one which must be spoken of fairly | ||
<small>Created by [[User:CurrentUK|CurrentUK]] ([[User talk:CurrentUK|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:The Almightey Drill|The Almightey Drill]] ([[User talk:The Almightey Drill|talk]]) at 12:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:CurrentUK|CurrentUK]] ([[User talk:CurrentUK|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:The Almightey Drill|The Almightey Drill]] ([[User talk:The Almightey Drill|talk]]) at 12:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* DYK checklist template | :* DYK checklist template | ||
| Line 42: | Line 33: | ||
:{{u|Georgejdorner}}: Whether it should or shouldn't be, ethnicity in British criminal cases has been discussed, even on cases in which there is no direct racial motive. For as many politicians or authors who say that it comes from a foreign culture problem, there are as many who say that sexual crimes committed by ethnic minorities are overscrutinised and divert attention away from a crime committed by people from all walks of life (unfortunately, anywhere in the world, children are most likely to be abused by their parents more than anybody else). These two sides of the debate are presented in a way which is balanced (last time I checked) on the articles on the Rotherham and Rochdale cases. Those two are bywords for this type of criminal activity in the UK, to the same extent as "Columbine" would refer to the shooting. Despite the heavy jail term given for the Peterborough case, it received less debate and coverage than prior ones, where accusations of police and social service misconduct were reported as hindering prosecution for years. [[User:The Almightey Drill|'''tAD''']] ([[User talk:The Almightey Drill|talk]]) 16:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | :{{u|Georgejdorner}}: Whether it should or shouldn't be, ethnicity in British criminal cases has been discussed, even on cases in which there is no direct racial motive. For as many politicians or authors who say that it comes from a foreign culture problem, there are as many who say that sexual crimes committed by ethnic minorities are overscrutinised and divert attention away from a crime committed by people from all walks of life (unfortunately, anywhere in the world, children are most likely to be abused by their parents more than anybody else). These two sides of the debate are presented in a way which is balanced (last time I checked) on the articles on the Rotherham and Rochdale cases. Those two are bywords for this type of criminal activity in the UK, to the same extent as "Columbine" would refer to the shooting. Despite the heavy jail term given for the Peterborough case, it received less debate and coverage than prior ones, where accusations of police and social service misconduct were reported as hindering prosecution for years. [[User:The Almightey Drill|'''tAD''']] ([[User talk:The Almightey Drill|talk]]) 16:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | :: Thank you for the explanation.[[User:Georgejdorner|Georgejdorner]] ([[User talk:Georgejdorner|talk]]) 15:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC) | + | :: Thank you for the explanation.[[User:Georgejdorner|Georgejdorner]] ([[User talk:Georgejdorner|talk]]) 15:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 21:34, 24 April 2015
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 21:34, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Peterborough sex abuse case
- ... that in reaction to child sexual exploitation cases in Rochdale and in Rotherham, police investigated and prosecuted a similar case in Peterborough?
- Reviewed: Pennsylvania State Game Lands Number 55
- Comment: Not a nice topic, but one which must be spoken of fairly
Created by CurrentUK (talk). Nominated by The Almightey Drill (talk) at 12:27, 16 April 2015 (UTC).
- DYK checklist template
Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
- Thank you for the explanation.Georgejdorner (talk) 15:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)