Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Pippa Wicks"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Mandarax m (MOS:DYKPIPE) |
imported>MartinPoulter (review- hook needs a tweak) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :* Article is new enough, long enough and written in a suitably encyclopedic way with copious inline references. The text is original. This is a [[WP:BLP|BLP]] about a sometimes controversial figure but the article is carefully worded. QPQ done. I don't like ALT1 because future predictions can be upset ("life comes at you fast") but the first hook is a definite fact, interesting, and cited appropriately in the article. I worry that people reading quickly might get the impression the Co-operative Group employs people who are ''in'' modern slavery, rather than people who have escaped it. It would be a wrong reading, but I want to be certain that this misunderstanding won't happen. Could we have a variation of the hook that refers to "former victims" or "escapees"? [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] [[User:MartinPoulter|MartinPoulter]] ([[User talk:MartinPoulter|talk]]) 10:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 10:49, 21 July 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pippa Wicks
- ... that Pippa Wicks, the deputy chief executive officer of The Co-operative Group, has supported the company's employment of victims of modern slavery? Source: [1]
- ALT1:... that Pippa Wicks is scheduled to become the head of John Lewis & Partners in August 2020? Source: [2]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Théo Maledon
- Comment: Other hooks welcome
Created by Joseph2302 (talk) and Edwardx (talk). Nominated by Joseph2302 (talk) at 22:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC).
- Article is new enough, long enough and written in a suitably encyclopedic way with copious inline references. The text is original. This is a BLP about a sometimes controversial figure but the article is carefully worded. QPQ done. I don't like ALT1 because future predictions can be upset ("life comes at you fast") but the first hook is a definite fact, interesting, and cited appropriately in the article. I worry that people reading quickly might get the impression the Co-operative Group employs people who are in modern slavery, rather than people who have escaped it. It would be a wrong reading, but I want to be certain that this misunderstanding won't happen. Could we have a variation of the hook that refers to "former victims" or "escapees"?
MartinPoulter (talk) 10:48, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
- Article is new enough, long enough and written in a suitably encyclopedic way with copious inline references. The text is original. This is a BLP about a sometimes controversial figure but the article is carefully worded. QPQ done. I don't like ALT1 because future predictions can be upset ("life comes at you fast") but the first hook is a definite fact, interesting, and cited appropriately in the article. I worry that people reading quickly might get the impression the Co-operative Group employs people who are in modern slavery, rather than people who have escaped it. It would be a wrong reading, but I want to be certain that this misunderstanding won't happen. Could we have a variation of the hook that refers to "former victims" or "escapees"?