Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Poeciliopsis monacha"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Oceanh
(tick ok)
imported>PFHLai
(to P3)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from December 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=December 2015  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 11:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Poeciliopsis monacha, Poeciliopsis lucida====
 
====Poeciliopsis monacha, Poeciliopsis lucida====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Poeciliopsis monacha|Poeciliopsis monacha|Poeciliopsis lucida}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Poeciliopsis monacha|Poeciliopsis monacha|Poeciliopsis lucida}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that when a male '''[[Poeciliopsis lucida|clearfin livebearer]]''' mates with a female '''[[Poeciliopsis monacha|headwater livebearer]]''', the offspring are all female?
 
* ... that when a male '''[[Poeciliopsis lucida|clearfin livebearer]]''' mates with a female '''[[Poeciliopsis monacha|headwater livebearer]]''', the offspring are all female?
  
Line 16: Line 11:
 
:* ''Comment'': Also reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Mario Trafeli]]
 
:* ''Comment'': Also reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Mario Trafeli]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Self-nominated at 06:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Self-nominated at 06:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC).</small>
<!--Please check to make sure these auto-generated credits are correct.
 
* {{DYKmake|Poeciliopsis monacha|Cwmhiraeth|subpage=Poeciliopsis monacha}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Poeciliopsis lucida|Cwmhiraeth}}
 
-->
 
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Both articles are long enough, ''Poeciliopsis lucida'' is new (created 11 Dec), and ''Poeciliopsis monacha'' is recently expanded > 5x. Neutral, interesting and appropriately referenced. Hook is short enough, neutral and interesting, cited in both articles, and verified in online reference. Spot checks did not reveal close paraphrasing. QPQ done. [[User:Oceanh|Oceanh]] ([[User talk:Oceanh|talk]]) 21:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 
  
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Both articles are long enough, ''Poeciliopsis lucida'' is new (created 11 Dec), and ''Poeciliopsis monacha'' is recently expanded > 5x. Neutral, interesting and appropriately referenced. Hook is short enough, neutral and interesting, cited in both articles, and verified in online reference. Spot checks did not reveal close paraphrasing. QPQ done. [[User:Oceanh|Oceanh]] ([[User talk:Oceanh|talk]]) 21:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 11:59, 20 December 2015

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 11:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Poeciliopsis monacha, Poeciliopsis lucida

Created by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 06:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Both articles are long enough, Poeciliopsis lucida is new (created 11 Dec), and Poeciliopsis monacha is recently expanded > 5x. Neutral, interesting and appropriately referenced. Hook is short enough, neutral and interesting, cited in both articles, and verified in online reference. Spot checks did not reveal close paraphrasing. QPQ done. Oceanh (talk) 21:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)