Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Poetry in Motion (film)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SL93
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 4)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from July 2017]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=July 2017  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 18:40, 25 July 2017 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Poetry in Motion (film)====
 
====Poetry in Motion (film)====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Poetry in Motion (film)|Poetry in Motion (film)}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Poetry in Motion (film)|Poetry in Motion (film)}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* <s>... that the film '''''[[Poetry in Motion (film)|Poetry in Motion]]''''' was based on ''[[The New American Poetry 1945–1960]]''? </s>
 
* <s>... that the film '''''[[Poetry in Motion (film)|Poetry in Motion]]''''' was based on ''[[The New American Poetry 1945–1960]]''? </s>
 
* '''ALT1''' <s>... that all 47 hours of footage for '''''[[Poetry in Motion (film)|Poetry in Motion]]''''' is held at the [[Art Gallery of Ontario]]?</s>
 
* '''ALT1''' <s>... that all 47 hours of footage for '''''[[Poetry in Motion (film)|Poetry in Motion]]''''' is held at the [[Art Gallery of Ontario]]?</s>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Pi Day Die Day|Pi Day Die Day]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Pi Day Die Day|Pi Day Die Day]]
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]). Self-nominated at 04:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]). Self-nominated at 04:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Poetry in Motion (film)|SL93|subpage=Poetry in Motion (film)}}
 
-->
 
  
 
: [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Interesting topic, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. I confess to not understand the ALT, - "hours .... is"? And do you want to promote that library? - The original hook is a bit too tame, compared to "orgasmic" in the article. Something in between perhaps? --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:49, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 
: [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Interesting topic, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. I confess to not understand the ALT, - "hours .... is"? And do you want to promote that library? - The original hook is a bit too tame, compared to "orgasmic" in the article. Something in between perhaps? --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:49, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Line 28: Line 20:
 
::::::I'm lost. What's wrong with the sentence? [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 14:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 
::::::I'm lost. What's wrong with the sentence? [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 14:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 
::::::: I think you can't say "hours is held", but need "hours are held". You can say "footage is held", no?  
 
::::::: I think you can't say "hours is held", but need "hours are held". You can say "footage is held", no?  
::::::::I keep on getting is and are mixed up. I will change it now. [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 14:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
+
::::::::I keep on getting is and are mixed up. I will change it now. [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 14:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 18:40, 25 July 2017

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 18:40, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Poetry in Motion (film)

5x expanded by SL93 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC).

Symbol question.svg Interesting topic, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. I confess to not understand the ALT, - "hours .... is"? And do you want to promote that library? - The original hook is a bit too tame, compared to "orgasmic" in the article. Something in between perhaps? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Gerda Arendt 47 hours of footage were originally recorded, which were later reduced to a manageable amount for a film. It's not a library. It's an important museum. SL93 (talk) 12:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Sorry about library vs. museum, - this hook should promote the film, not any place, - unless you want it. I - English not first language - had to look up what footage means, and think that other films have much more., so what's "hooky" about it? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure how, but you removed my ALT2.
ALT2: ... that the film Poetry in Motion has been described in a review as orgasmic for students of contemporary poetry? SL93 (talk) 14:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
It was not intentional, I had not even seen it, sorry once more.
Symbol confirmed.svg Yes, that's nice! I added "in a review", for safety. - Please change article, "hours ... are held" or "footage ... is held", no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
I'm lost. What's wrong with the sentence? SL93 (talk) 14:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
I think you can't say "hours is held", but need "hours are held". You can say "footage is held", no?
I keep on getting is and are mixed up. I will change it now. SL93 (talk) 14:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)