Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Private View (Inside No. 9)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(To Prep 3)
imported>WOSlinker
m (fix italics)
 
Line 6: Line 6:
 
====Private View====
 
====Private View====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Private View (Inside No. 9)|Private View}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Private View (Inside No. 9)|Private View}}
* ... that "'''[[Private View (Inside No. 9)|Private View]]'''", an episode of ''[[Inside No. 9]]'', was a [[homage (arts)|homage]] to ''[[Theatre of Blood]]'' satirising the world of [[contemporary art]]?  <small>Source: "In a piece that seemed mostly to be paying topsy-turvy homage to the camp 1973 horror flick Theatre of Blood. ... Private View satirised a certain kind of contemporary art, all bashed up mannequins and blindingly obvious metaphors." [[Rachel Cooke]], ''[https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/tv-radio/2017/03/man-alive-why-flaws-inside-no-9-only-emphasise-its-brilliance New Statesman''])</small>
+
* ... that "'''[[Private View (Inside No. 9)|Private View]]'''", an episode of ''[[Inside No. 9]]'', was a [[homage (arts)|homage]] to ''[[Theatre of Blood]]'' satirising the world of [[contemporary art]]?  <small>Source: "In a piece that seemed mostly to be paying topsy-turvy homage to the camp 1973 horror flick Theatre of Blood. ... Private View satirised a certain kind of contemporary art, all bashed up mannequins and blindingly obvious metaphors." [[Rachel Cooke]], ''[https://www.newstatesman.com/culture/tv-radio/2017/03/man-alive-why-flaws-inside-no-9-only-emphasise-its-brilliance New Statesman]'')</small>
 
:*
 
:*
 
<small>Converted from a redirect by [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]). Self-nominated at 21:26, 4 January 2018 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Converted from a redirect by [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]). Self-nominated at 21:26, 4 January 2018 (UTC).</small>

Latest revision as of 22:21, 25 October 2019

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:12, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Private View

Converted from a redirect by J Milburn (talk). Self-nominated at 21:26, 4 January 2018 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg - Length, Date, Cite, and Earwigs check. All that is needed is a QPQ and this will be good to go. Mifter (talk) 06:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg - Fantastic, thanks. Mifter (talk) 01:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)