Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Propaganda of success"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Allen3
(to prep3)
imported>KolbertBot
m (Bot: HTTP→HTTPS (v475))
 
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
:* It's hard to find space for new conceptual articles on Wikipedia, but I think Piotrus has done a good job here. Cool.
 
:* It's hard to find space for new conceptual articles on Wikipedia, but I think Piotrus has done a good job here. Cool.
:* Article is long enough, new enough and well sourced. Hook fact is interesting and can be verified here [http://books.google.com/books?id=c1oQ2Prl8JIC&pg=PA75#v=onepage&q&f=false here].
+
:* Article is long enough, new enough and well sourced. Hook fact is interesting and can be verified here [https://books.google.com/books?id=c1oQ2Prl8JIC&pg=PA75#v=onepage&q&f=false here].
 
:* My only request: [[User:Piotrus|Piotrus]], can we tweak the grammar of the hook just a little bit? For example, to:
 
:* My only request: [[User:Piotrus|Piotrus]], can we tweak the grammar of the hook just a little bit? For example, to:
 
::* '''Alt1''' ... that '''[[propaganda of success]]''' was extensively used during the 1970s [[propaganda in the People's Republic of Poland|by the People's Republic of Poland]]?
 
::* '''Alt1''' ... that '''[[propaganda of success]]''' was extensively used during the 1970s [[propaganda in the People's Republic of Poland|by the People's Republic of Poland]]?

Latest revision as of 21:21, 1 November 2017

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 19:39, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Propaganda of success

Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nominated at 07:30, 10 September 2013 (UTC).

  • It's hard to find space for new conceptual articles on Wikipedia, but I think Piotrus has done a good job here. Cool.
  • Article is long enough, new enough and well sourced. Hook fact is interesting and can be verified here here.
  • My only request: Piotrus, can we tweak the grammar of the hook just a little bit? For example, to:
  • Or a more radical change:
  • Or a different change? I just think the ending is a little clumsy the way it's worded now.
  • Thank you for this contribution and happy September to you. groupuscule (talk) 04:45, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
  • 16px Great. Good to go; promoter's choice between Alt1 & Alt2. groupuscule (talk) 18:20, 15 September 2013 (UTC)