Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Punta Gorda Fish Co."
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Seattle (review) |
imported>Seattle (review) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
::* The article has been further expanded and now has a total of 10,023 bytes. [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 21:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC) | ::* The article has been further expanded and now has a total of 10,023 bytes. [[User:Cbl62|Cbl62]] ([[User talk:Cbl62|talk]]) 21:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The hook is long enough, and there is no picture to review. I checked a few of the entries against reference 13, and they were good. I am AGF on reference 14. The hook is less than 200 characters, and it's passably interesting. The article is neutral and has at least an inline citation for every paragraph, excluding the lead. AGF on the books not being closely paraphrased. The two citations I did check, 3 and 5, are not | + | :::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The hook is long enough, and there is no picture to review. I checked a few of the entries against reference 13, and they were good. I am AGF on reference 14. The hook is less than 200 characters, and it's passably interesting. The article is neutral and has at least an inline citation for every paragraph, excluding the lead. AGF on the books not being closely paraphrased. The two citations I did check, 3 and 5, are not closely paraphrased in the article. Pass. [[User:Albacore|Albacore]] ([[User talk:Albacore|talk]]) 00:54, 8 October 2012 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 00:55, 8 October 2012
Punta Gorda Fish Co.
- ... that ten Florida fish cabins and icehouses built by the Punta Gorda Fish Co. have been listed on the National Register of Historic Places?
- Reviewed: 1972 Tangerine Bowl
Created/expanded by Doncram (talk), Cbl62 (talk). Nominated by Cbl62 (talk) at 19:50, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
The hook is long enough, and there is no picture to review. I checked a few of the entries against reference 13, and they were good. I am AGF on reference 14. The hook is less than 200 characters, and it's passably interesting. The article is neutral and has at least an inline citation for every paragraph, excluding the lead. AGF on the books not being closely paraphrased. The two citations I did check, 3 and 5, are not closely paraphrased in the article. Pass. Albacore (talk) 00:54, 8 October 2012 (UTC)