Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Rallicola and Apterygon"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Kevmin
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(To Prep 6)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from November 2017]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=November 2017  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:19, 18 November 2017 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Rallicola, Apterygon====
 
====Rallicola, Apterygon====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Rallicola and Apterygon|Rallicola|Apterygon}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Rallicola and Apterygon|Rallicola|Apterygon}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that [[lice]] in the genus '''''[[Apterygon]]''''' and the '''''[[Rallicola]]''''' subgenus ''Aptericola'' are [[endemic]] to New Zealand and are [[ectoparasites]] of ''Apteryx'' ([[kiwi bird]]s)?  <small>Source: {{doi|10.7931/J2/FNZ.76}}{{free access}}. Page 20: "The New Zealand louse fauna is not an exception, with no endemic family, and only two genera (''Apterygon'', ''Melibrueelia'') and two subgenera of ''Rallicola'' (''Aptericola'', ''Huiacola'') endemic to this country. These endemic genera and subgenera are from endemic terrestrial hosts: kiwis and passerines." As well as pages 39–41, 186–188, and most relevantly 245.</small>
 
* ... that [[lice]] in the genus '''''[[Apterygon]]''''' and the '''''[[Rallicola]]''''' subgenus ''Aptericola'' are [[endemic]] to New Zealand and are [[ectoparasites]] of ''Apteryx'' ([[kiwi bird]]s)?  <small>Source: {{doi|10.7931/J2/FNZ.76}}{{free access}}. Page 20: "The New Zealand louse fauna is not an exception, with no endemic family, and only two genera (''Apterygon'', ''Melibrueelia'') and two subgenera of ''Rallicola'' (''Aptericola'', ''Huiacola'') endemic to this country. These endemic genera and subgenera are from endemic terrestrial hosts: kiwis and passerines." As well as pages 39–41, 186–188, and most relevantly 245.</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that [[kiwi bird]]s (''Apteryx'') are parasitized by [[lice]] in the genus '''''[[Apterygon]]''''' and in the subgenus '''''[[Rallicola]]''''' (''Aptericola'')?  <small>Source: ibid, mostly p. 245.</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that [[kiwi bird]]s (''Apteryx'') are parasitized by [[lice]] in the genus '''''[[Apterygon]]''''' and in the subgenus '''''[[Rallicola]]''''' (''Aptericola'')?  <small>Source: ibid, mostly p. 245.</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Fatou Kiné Camara|Did you know nominations/Fatou Kiné Camara]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Fatou Kiné Camara|Did you know nominations/Fatou Kiné Camara]]
 
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]) at 03:46, 5 November 2017 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]) at 03:46, 5 November 2017 (UTC).</small>
<!--Please check to make sure these auto-generated credits are correct.
 
* {{DYKmake|Rallicola|Umimmak|subpage=Rallicola and Apterygon}}
 
* {{DYKmake|Apterygon|Umimmak|subpage=Rallicola and Apterygon}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*Starting Review--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 15:09, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
 
:*Starting Review--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 15:09, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Line 24: Line 15:
 
::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]Articles are both new enough and long enough.  Both well cited, neutral, and hook is cited with verified sources.  No policy issues are identified and no copyvio problems are seen.  nomination looks good to go as soon as the second QPQ is complete.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 00:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 
::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]Articles are both new enough and long enough.  Both well cited, neutral, and hook is cited with verified sources.  No policy issues are identified and no copyvio problems are seen.  nomination looks good to go as soon as the second QPQ is complete.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 00:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 
:::*Thanks, {{u|BlueMoonset}}! {{ping|Kevmin}} Second QPQ has been done; please see [[Template:Did you know nominations/Donaldson Site|Did you know nominations/Donaldson Site]]. [[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]) 03:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 
:::*Thanks, {{u|BlueMoonset}}! {{ping|Kevmin}} Second QPQ has been done; please see [[Template:Did you know nominations/Donaldson Site|Did you know nominations/Donaldson Site]]. [[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]) 03:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
:::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]  Second QPQ done articles have not changed in the time since reviewed.  Good to go! Apologies for the delay.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 16:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
+
:::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]  Second QPQ done articles have not changed in the time since reviewed.  Good to go! Apologies for the delay.--[[User:Kevmin|<font color="#120A8F">Kev</font>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<font color="#228B22">min</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 16:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 06:19, 18 November 2017

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:19, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Rallicola, Apterygon

  • ... that lice in the genus Apterygon and the Rallicola subgenus Aptericola are endemic to New Zealand and are ectoparasites of Apteryx (kiwi birds)? Source: doi:10.7931/J2/FNZ.76Template:Only in printFree to read. Page 20: "The New Zealand louse fauna is not an exception, with no endemic family, and only two genera (Apterygon, Melibrueelia) and two subgenera of Rallicola (Aptericola, Huiacola) endemic to this country. These endemic genera and subgenera are from endemic terrestrial hosts: kiwis and passerines." As well as pages 39–41, 186–188, and most relevantly 245.

Created/expanded by Umimmak (talk). Nominated by Umimmak (talk) at 03:46, 5 November 2017 (UTC).

  • Starting Review--Kevmin § 15:09, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Note to Umimmak: because you have nominated two separate articles, Rallicola and Apterygon, you will need to supply a second quid pro quo review: one QPQ per article nominated. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:11, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svgArticles are both new enough and long enough. Both well cited, neutral, and hook is cited with verified sources. No policy issues are identified and no copyvio problems are seen. nomination looks good to go as soon as the second QPQ is complete.--Kevmin § 00:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)