Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Randy Baker"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GOOD 2 GO. Nice job on stock car racer bio., Maile66 (talk) 13:34, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
imported>PumpkinSky (prep3) |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
====Randy Baker==== | ====Randy Baker==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Randy Baker|Randy Baker}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Randy Baker|Randy Baker}} | ||
| − | + | *... that despite being the son of a two-time [[NASCAR]] champion and brother of a [[1980 Daytona 500|Daytona 500]] winner, '''[[Randy Baker]]''' never finished better than 17th in NASCAR competition? | |
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bufo eichwaldi|Bufo eichwaldi]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bufo eichwaldi|Bufo eichwaldi]] | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] ([[User talk:The Bushranger|talk]]). Self nom at 11:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] ([[User talk:The Bushranger|talk]]). Self nom at 11:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)</small> | ||
Latest revision as of 14:22, 7 March 2018
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 22:23, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Randy Baker
- ... that despite being the son of a two-time NASCAR champion and brother of a Daytona 500 winner, Randy Baker never finished better than 17th in NASCAR competition?
- Reviewed: Bufo eichwaldi
Created/expanded by The Bushranger (talk). Self nom at 11:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Electric Catfish 16:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Requesting that the (new) reviewer explain what was reviewed. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
Requires a new, full review. Original tick, one of three made by the editor in the space of four minutes, cannot be considered an adequate review, given the failure to subsequently enumerate what was reviewed. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:54, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- The following has been checked in this review by Maile66
- QPQ done by The Bushranger on August 30, 2012
- Article created by The Bushranger on August 30, 2012 and has 1,540 characters of readable prose
- NPOV, well written
- Every paragraph sourced
- Hook is interesting, short enough at 160 characters, and sourced at the end of the sentence
- Duplication Detector run, no copyvio found