Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Ravinder Goswami"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Tachs
(DYK comments)
imported>Yoninah
(restoring tick)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
::*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Returned from prep. There is no inline citation after the sentence containing the hook fact (ALT0), and it's unclear if the source given on this nomination is talking about the first study in India or the first time people got vitamin D deficiency. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 11:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 
::*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Returned from prep. There is no inline citation after the sentence containing the hook fact (ALT0), and it's unclear if the source given on this nomination is talking about the first study in India or the first time people got vitamin D deficiency. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 11:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 
::: {{ping|Yoninah|Argento Surfer}} Inline citation provided (the previous sentence had the citation and the facts mentioned here also refers to that citation). Vitamin deficiency must have been in India from time immemorial. I feel it would too much to ask if the source is mentioning about ''first time people got vitamin D deficiency'' in India. If that was the case, it would still only be revealed through a study. ''His research work has documented the prevalence, significance and causes of vitamin D deficiency in apparently healthy individuals for the first time in India''. It is talking about the first time study and documentation of the problem. The following link (available as reference in the article) also talks about the study. [http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Sunlight-enough-no-need-of-vitamin-D-drive/articleshow/51624685.cms Sunlight enough, no need of vitamin-D drive]. Trust I have clarified. [[User:Tachs|jojo@nthony]] ([[User talk:Tachs|talk]]) 11:24, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 
::: {{ping|Yoninah|Argento Surfer}} Inline citation provided (the previous sentence had the citation and the facts mentioned here also refers to that citation). Vitamin deficiency must have been in India from time immemorial. I feel it would too much to ask if the source is mentioning about ''first time people got vitamin D deficiency'' in India. If that was the case, it would still only be revealed through a study. ''His research work has documented the prevalence, significance and causes of vitamin D deficiency in apparently healthy individuals for the first time in India''. It is talking about the first time study and documentation of the problem. The following link (available as reference in the article) also talks about the study. [http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Sunlight-enough-no-need-of-vitamin-D-drive/articleshow/51624685.cms Sunlight enough, no need of vitamin-D drive]. Trust I have clarified. [[User:Tachs|jojo@nthony]] ([[User talk:Tachs|talk]]) 11:24, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 +
::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] OK, thanks. Restoring tick per Argento Surfer's review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 14:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 14:38, 12 April 2017

Ravinder Goswami

Created by Tachs (talk). Self-nominated at 18:36, 3 April 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg New enough, long enough, within policy (high results on earwig are from article names and authors). Both hooks are short enough. ALT0 would read better rephrased as "Ravinder Goswami was the first researcher to study vitamin D deficiency in India" I prefer ALT1. QPQ was reviewed by User:Tachs, who is using the signature "jojo@nthony" Argento Surfer (talk) 13:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol possible vote.svg Returned from prep. There is no inline citation after the sentence containing the hook fact (ALT0), and it's unclear if the source given on this nomination is talking about the first study in India or the first time people got vitamin D deficiency. Yoninah (talk) 11:01, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Template:Ping Inline citation provided (the previous sentence had the citation and the facts mentioned here also refers to that citation). Vitamin deficiency must have been in India from time immemorial. I feel it would too much to ask if the source is mentioning about first time people got vitamin D deficiency in India. If that was the case, it would still only be revealed through a study. His research work has documented the prevalence, significance and causes of vitamin D deficiency in apparently healthy individuals for the first time in India. It is talking about the first time study and documentation of the problem. The following link (available as reference in the article) also talks about the study. Sunlight enough, no need of vitamin-D drive. Trust I have clarified. jojo@nthony (talk) 11:24, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg OK, thanks. Restoring tick per Argento Surfer's review. Yoninah (talk) 14:38, 12 April 2017 (UTC)