Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Re Fong Thin Choo"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jarry1250
(approved)
imported>Carabinieri
(pass)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:DYK/Successful nominations&nbsp;from January 2013]] [[Category:DYK/Successful nominations|Re Fong Thin Choo]] [[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from January 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA">
|monthyear=January 2013
+
:{{DYKF|11}}&nbsp;<i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Re Fong Thin Choo]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Re Fong Thin Choo|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Re Fong Thin Choo|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</i></span>{{clear}}
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: <b>promoted</b> by [[User:Carabinieri|Carabinieri]] ([[User talk:Carabinieri|talk]]) 01:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC).<br />
 +
}}
 
====Re Fong Thin Choo====
 
====Re Fong Thin Choo====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Re Fong Thin Choo|Re Fong Thin Choo}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Re Fong Thin Choo|Re Fong Thin Choo}}
 
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
 
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
 
[[File:Supreme Court Building 2.JPG|100x100px|Supreme Court of Singapore]]
 
[[File:Supreme Court Building 2.JPG|100x100px|Supreme Court of Singapore]]
</div><!-- 
+
</div>
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
 
{{*mp}}... that in the 1991 [[administrative law in Singapore|administrative law]] case '''''[[Re Fong Thin Choo]]''''' the [[Singapore]] [[High Court of Singapore|High Court]] ''(building pictured)'' held that a public authority's decision can be invalidated if based on an incorrect fact?
 
{{*mp}}... that in the 1991 [[administrative law in Singapore|administrative law]] case '''''[[Re Fong Thin Choo]]''''' the [[Singapore]] [[High Court of Singapore|High Court]] ''(building pictured)'' held that a public authority's decision can be invalidated if based on an incorrect fact?
 
*'''ALT1''': ... that in the 1991 case '''''[[Re Fong Thin Choo]]''''' the [[Singapore]] [[High Court of Singapore|High Court]] ''(building pictured)'' held that a public authority's decision can be invalidated if based on a misconception or ignorance of a fact?
 
*'''ALT1''': ... that in the 1991 case '''''[[Re Fong Thin Choo]]''''' the [[Singapore]] [[High Court of Singapore|High Court]] ''(building pictured)'' held that a public authority's decision can be invalidated if based on a misconception or ignorance of a fact?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Andy Mineo|Andy Mineo]]
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Andy Mineo|Andy Mineo]]
 
:*''Comment'': The article was created by moving it from a sandbox on 19 January 2013. The hook is referenced by footnote 11.
 
:*''Comment'': The article was created by moving it from a sandbox on 19 January 2013. The hook is referenced by footnote 11.
 
<small>Created  by [[User:Kaden-ghz|Kaden-ghz]] ([[User talk:Kaden-ghz|talk]]), [[User:KONGzhenning|KONGzhenning]] ([[User talk:KONGzhenning|talk]]), [[User:Zzeggy|Zzeggy]] ([[User talk:Zzeggy|talk]]).  Nominated by [[User:Smuconlaw|Smuconlaw]] ([[User talk:Smuconlaw|talk]]) at 18:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created  by [[User:Kaden-ghz|Kaden-ghz]] ([[User talk:Kaden-ghz|talk]]), [[User:KONGzhenning|KONGzhenning]] ([[User talk:KONGzhenning|talk]]), [[User:Zzeggy|Zzeggy]] ([[User talk:Zzeggy|talk]]).  Nominated by [[User:Smuconlaw|Smuconlaw]] ([[User talk:Smuconlaw|talk]]) at 18:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC)</small>
<!--
 
*{{DYKmake|Re Fong Thin Choo|Kaden-ghz}}
 
*{{DYKmake|Re Fong Thin Choo|KONGzhenning}}
 
*{{DYKmake|Re Fong Thin Choo|Zzeggy}}
 
*{{DYKnom|Re Fong Thin Choo|Smuconlaw}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Looks good, though I am yet to undertake a plagiarism check. Before I do, it would be good for the hook text to be more explicitly included in the prose. Should only be a 30 second job :) Thanks, - [[User:Jarry1250|Jarry1250]]&nbsp;<sup>[''[[User_talk:Jarry1250|Deliberation]] [[Special:Contributions/Jarry1250|needed]]'']</sup> 13:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Looks good, though I am yet to undertake a plagiarism check. Before I do, it would be good for the hook text to be more explicitly included in the prose. Should only be a 30 second job :) Thanks, - [[User:Jarry1250|Jarry1250]]&nbsp;<sup>[''[[User_talk:Jarry1250|Deliberation]] [[Special:Contributions/Jarry1250|needed]]'']</sup> 13:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Line 33: Line 22:
 
:*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]]  Further review needed now that issues have been addressed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 21:27, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]]  Further review needed now that issues have been addressed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 21:27, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 
:::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Approved. - [[User:Jarry1250|Jarry1250]]&nbsp;<sup>[''[[User_talk:Jarry1250|Vacation]] [[Special:Contributions/Jarry1250|needed]]'']</sup> 22:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 
:::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Approved. - [[User:Jarry1250|Jarry1250]]&nbsp;<sup>[''[[User_talk:Jarry1250|Vacation]] [[Special:Contributions/Jarry1250|needed]]'']</sup> 22:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
{{-}}{{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]][[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:DYK/Nominations|Pending]][[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 01:05, 18 February 2013

Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Re Fong Thin Choo's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by Carabinieri (talk) 01:05, 18 February 2013 (UTC).

Re Fong Thin Choo

Supreme Court of Singapore

  • Reviewed: Andy Mineo
  • Comment: The article was created by moving it from a sandbox on 19 January 2013. The hook is referenced by footnote 11.

Created by Kaden-ghz (talk), KONGzhenning (talk), Zzeggy (talk). Nominated by Smuconlaw (talk) at 18:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Symbol question.svg Looks good, though I am yet to undertake a plagiarism check. Before I do, it would be good for the hook text to be more explicitly included in the prose. Should only be a 30 second job :) Thanks, - Jarry1250 [Deliberation needed] 13:59, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for reviewing the nomination. Could you clarify if you are suggesting that the article or the hook be reworded? As indicated, the hook is referenced by footnote 11. See also footnote 13. — SMUconlaw (talk) 14:15, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
I'm saying that footnote 11 is used twice, and neither time is it citing the specific hook ("a public authority's decision can be invalidated if based on an incorrect fact"). Indeed, the wording of the hook is closer to that in the section headed "Applicability of the ground of error as to material fact in Singapore", which would benefit for a rewording of the first paragraph to make the point clearer (ensuring it remains cited). - Jarry1250 [Deliberation needed] 18:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
OK, I rephrased the text at footnote 34 slightly, and also reworded the hook (see ALT 1). Hope that's better. — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote4.png Further review needed now that issues have been addressed. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:27, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg Approved. - Jarry1250 [Vacation needed] 22:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)