Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Remote sensing (geology)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Graeme Bartlett
(create)
 
imported>Gerda Arendt
(qs)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that '''[[Remote sensing (geology)|remote sensing]]''' ''(example pictured)'' helps geologists study otherwise inaccessible areas, even other planets? <small>Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)</small>
+
* ... that '''[[Remote sensing (geology)|remote sensing]]''' ''(example pictured)'' helps geologists study otherwise inaccessible areas, even other planets?
** '''ALT1''':... that '''[[Remote sensing (geology)|remote sensing]]''' ''(example pictured)'' can help geological studies of inaccessible areas where earth scientists find it hard to reach? <small>Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)</small>
+
** '''ALT1''':<s>... that '''[[Remote sensing (geology)|remote sensing]]''' ''(example pictured)'' can help geological studies of inaccessible areas where earth scientists find it hard to reach?</s>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Juanita Musson|Juanita Musson]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Juanita Musson|Juanita Musson]]
 
:* ''Comment'': part of University of Hong Kong/Regional Geology (Fall Semester 2017)
 
:* ''Comment'': part of University of Hong Kong/Regional Geology (Fall Semester 2017)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :-->
+
: [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Substantial scientific article, on excellent sources, well illustrated, no copyvio obvious. - The original is more to the point and more interesting. The image is unfortunately very obscure in small size, and the caption doesn't help much. Drop it? Leave it just to get attention, with a better caption? - The topic is well beyond my capabilities of grasping science, but I checked that it is written in fluent English. I made several formatting changes: a space needs to go after a ref, but not before. I changed them for beginning and end, but please complete the task in the middle. I didn't change in the lead, because ideally that should only summarize what's in the body and then doesn't need ''any'' ref. Please see if you want to move some of it to Overview, only leaving a summary. The planets (= hook fact) appear at present only in the lead. - I confess that I prefer to see an image below a header, not next to it. I urge you to think about image sizes. They should be specified not in pixels, but as an upright relative parameter, for example 1.1 instead of 250px, to adjust to users' preferences. Some images seem very large, - please check where you may improve the layout. - Now the hook: could we word something that relates more closely to the image? --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 11:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 11:49, 25 November 2017

Remote sensing (geology)

Richat Structure by Shuttle Radar Topography Mission
Richat Structure by Shuttle Radar Topography Mission
  • ... that remote sensing (example pictured) helps geologists study otherwise inaccessible areas, even other planets?
    • ALT1:... that remote sensing (example pictured) can help geological studies of inaccessible areas where earth scientists find it hard to reach?
  • Reviewed: Juanita Musson
  • Comment: part of University of Hong Kong/Regional Geology (Fall Semester 2017)

Moved to mainspace by Wcpatrick6572 (talk). Nominated by Graeme Bartlett (talk) at 09:52, 18 November 2017 (UTC).

Symbol question.svg Substantial scientific article, on excellent sources, well illustrated, no copyvio obvious. - The original is more to the point and more interesting. The image is unfortunately very obscure in small size, and the caption doesn't help much. Drop it? Leave it just to get attention, with a better caption? - The topic is well beyond my capabilities of grasping science, but I checked that it is written in fluent English. I made several formatting changes: a space needs to go after a ref, but not before. I changed them for beginning and end, but please complete the task in the middle. I didn't change in the lead, because ideally that should only summarize what's in the body and then doesn't need any ref. Please see if you want to move some of it to Overview, only leaving a summary. The planets (= hook fact) appear at present only in the lead. - I confess that I prefer to see an image below a header, not next to it. I urge you to think about image sizes. They should be specified not in pixels, but as an upright relative parameter, for example 1.1 instead of 250px, to adjust to users' preferences. Some images seem very large, - please check where you may improve the layout. - Now the hook: could we word something that relates more closely to the image? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:49, 25 November 2017 (UTC)