Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Ren Zhiqiang"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(full review needed)
imported>Ironholds
(re)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] looks good! :). [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 23:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] looks good! :). [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 23:59, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 
::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  {{ping|Ironholds}} you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the [[WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria|five main DYK criteria]] have been met. Also, a QPQ is still pending. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 00:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 
::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  {{ping|Ironholds}} you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the [[WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria|five main DYK criteria]] have been met. Also, a QPQ is still pending. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 00:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 +
:::* {{Ping|Yoninah}} very well; the article is [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ren_Zhiqiang&oldid=706368294 new enough] within its creation-> submission period, neutral, has consistent (and high-quality) sourcing, sufficient length, an appropriately-sized hook and an ''interesting'' hook (and particularly timely given US politics right now). Good point about the QPQ; {{Ping|Andreas Philopater}}? [[User:Ironholds|Ironholds]] ([[User talk:Ironholds|talk]]) 00:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 00:58, 29 February 2016

Ren Zhiqiang

  • ... that Ren Zhiqiang, a property tycoon and outspoken critic of the government, has been called "China's Donald Trump"?
  • Reviewed: TBD

Created by Andreas Philopater (talk) and Zanhe (talk). Nominated by Zanhe (talk) at 06:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC).

  • Template:Ping very well; the article is new enough within its creation-> submission period, neutral, has consistent (and high-quality) sourcing, sufficient length, an appropriately-sized hook and an interesting hook (and particularly timely given US politics right now). Good point about the QPQ; Template:Ping? Ironholds (talk) 00:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)